Had to hurry this post hope there are no mistakes
My Bad about the Father thing. The fact is I actually did consider that you may not have had a Father relationship, but, did not contemplate a alternative (ok I was just burnt out on answering the questions and the questions to those questions and etc. etc.) So I just used the analogy for God which Jesus does to get that dual meaning (yes it had a duel meaning). Thinking about it now I could have just said "was everything logical to you as a child?" (which loses the duel meaning). However, you really can't assume that either. It's possible (but much less likely) that one may have amnesia and not remember their childhood. The problem is God can only be spoken of in analogy. Everything we say about him is a approximation. Language itself is a approximation too as it is built on the understanding of the underlying meanings of the individual and therefore communication will always be imperfect. Basically at some point a assumption must be made in order for communication to begin if it's "Do you speak English?". One expects they will respond if they do. However, they may actually speak English, but, be deaf or simplify not want to talk. Since people are not capable of a absolute belief (except maybe self), only probabilities, one must assume something first in order to do anything. I actually think we are agreeing here.
My concept of the duality of Man and God could be said to be based on perspective, are you seeing though Man's eyes or God's? To be clearer God wants to have a relationship with us, but, knowing that we can never fully understand him (as we are) he must have shaped this world to have things that he could use in analogy to explain himself. When we attempt to understand God's love for us we look to the example he gave in Christ, but, do you really think any Earthly action could show the entire expanse of a love that is infinite? When God showed himself to Moses he said if he showed all of himself Moses would die! By the way not everyone knows what it is like to lose a son and certainly no one knows what it is like to die (because you'd be dead ) it requires a imagination to understand Jesus' death on any level (and before you say it yes Christ's sacrifice was also a payment not just a example).
As far as the rock question I do think it is apt to the free will vs.predestination argument because it's the same thing. Both are self-contradictory or you can't have free will and have God be in control. If God has absolute power he should be able to do all things which would include making something that's beyond his power, but, if he makes something beyond his power (either rock or free human will it does not matter) he doesn't have absolute power then. That's by man's logic though not God's. Luke 18:27 "And he said, The things which are impossible with men are possible with God." I basically believe with God things that are self-contradictory to man are possible with God. The idea of off and on at the same time illustrates a third alternative in what we considered a yes or no question (although I don't believe in the science or the application of it to Man).
Maybe my answer to the "can God make a rock so big he can't lift it" argument will be easier to understand if I phrase it this way.
God creates this huge rock.
A Man looks on as he tries to lift the rock and sees God can't lift it.
The Man says: You couldn't lift that rock!
God says: No I couldn't lift that rock, but, I'm lifting it.
Man says: How???
God says: I'm lifting the planet it's on so I'm lifting it.
You see he is both lifting and not lifting it based on perspective.
I APOLOGIZE FOR GETTING SO OFF TOPIC SORRY, SORRY. Hopefully this will settle the free will vs. predestination issue.
As far Father issues I know Joyce Meyer's father sexually abused her. I tend to wonder how she came to forgive him. Just something you may want to look into. I don't wish to pry. (Joyce Meyer has a large Ministry if you do not know).
BTW my definition of a hurried post is 4+ hours working on it and that only includes the actual writing time not all the thinking time so believe me I do think about everything...a lot.
My Bad about the Father thing. The fact is I actually did consider that you may not have had a Father relationship, but, did not contemplate a alternative (ok I was just burnt out on answering the questions and the questions to those questions and etc. etc.) So I just used the analogy for God which Jesus does to get that dual meaning (yes it had a duel meaning). Thinking about it now I could have just said "was everything logical to you as a child?" (which loses the duel meaning). However, you really can't assume that either. It's possible (but much less likely) that one may have amnesia and not remember their childhood. The problem is God can only be spoken of in analogy. Everything we say about him is a approximation. Language itself is a approximation too as it is built on the understanding of the underlying meanings of the individual and therefore communication will always be imperfect. Basically at some point a assumption must be made in order for communication to begin if it's "Do you speak English?". One expects they will respond if they do. However, they may actually speak English, but, be deaf or simplify not want to talk. Since people are not capable of a absolute belief (except maybe self), only probabilities, one must assume something first in order to do anything. I actually think we are agreeing here.
My concept of the duality of Man and God could be said to be based on perspective, are you seeing though Man's eyes or God's? To be clearer God wants to have a relationship with us, but, knowing that we can never fully understand him (as we are) he must have shaped this world to have things that he could use in analogy to explain himself. When we attempt to understand God's love for us we look to the example he gave in Christ, but, do you really think any Earthly action could show the entire expanse of a love that is infinite? When God showed himself to Moses he said if he showed all of himself Moses would die! By the way not everyone knows what it is like to lose a son and certainly no one knows what it is like to die (because you'd be dead ) it requires a imagination to understand Jesus' death on any level (and before you say it yes Christ's sacrifice was also a payment not just a example).
As far as the rock question I do think it is apt to the free will vs.predestination argument because it's the same thing. Both are self-contradictory or you can't have free will and have God be in control. If God has absolute power he should be able to do all things which would include making something that's beyond his power, but, if he makes something beyond his power (either rock or free human will it does not matter) he doesn't have absolute power then. That's by man's logic though not God's. Luke 18:27 "And he said, The things which are impossible with men are possible with God." I basically believe with God things that are self-contradictory to man are possible with God. The idea of off and on at the same time illustrates a third alternative in what we considered a yes or no question (although I don't believe in the science or the application of it to Man).
Maybe my answer to the "can God make a rock so big he can't lift it" argument will be easier to understand if I phrase it this way.
God creates this huge rock.
A Man looks on as he tries to lift the rock and sees God can't lift it.
The Man says: You couldn't lift that rock!
God says: No I couldn't lift that rock, but, I'm lifting it.
Man says: How???
God says: I'm lifting the planet it's on so I'm lifting it.
You see he is both lifting and not lifting it based on perspective.
I APOLOGIZE FOR GETTING SO OFF TOPIC SORRY, SORRY. Hopefully this will settle the free will vs. predestination issue.
As far Father issues I know Joyce Meyer's father sexually abused her. I tend to wonder how she came to forgive him. Just something you may want to look into. I don't wish to pry. (Joyce Meyer has a large Ministry if you do not know).
BTW my definition of a hurried post is 4+ hours working on it and that only includes the actual writing time not all the thinking time so believe me I do think about everything...a lot.
Last edited: