Tek7 (Legacy)
CGA & ToJ President
I'm not saying all warfare is right. War should, of course, be a last resort. Still, if someone was planning to invade America, wouldn't a declaration of war and a gathering of troops be the necessary recourse if negotiations failed?Dark Virtue said:I've never really bought into the whole "murder is wrong, but warfare is ok" thing".
One could argue that one should do what one can to anticipate the actions of one's enemy.Dark Virtue said:Do you make it a point of never playing as the terrorists in CS?
Agreed.Dark Virtue said:REAL warfare had reasons for going to war. WWII was about stopping the tyranny of a madman. While there were some truly evil Nazis, your average member of the Wermacht or the Luftwaffe was just a guy fighting for his country.
I didn't meant to imply that playing BF2 is a lofty thing, but rather it simulates a noble effort: protecting American freedoms. This is a far cry from killing prostitutes and stealing cars in Grand Theft Auto. My intent was to distinguish between violence without malice and violence for sensory pleasure and profit.Dark Virtue said:You can't honestly compare a round of BF2 with historical warfare. BF2 is about the kills, pure and simple. Not for some higher ideal or purpose.
Actually, I usually play Onslaught, which is a team-based gametype. I have my graphics settings configured so that there is no blood or gore during gameplay. I would equate playing Onslaught with playing paintball: you're "playing" at eliminating other players to complete a team objective. No one dies in the process. There's no malice involved as there's no backstory and people (ideally) make more of an effort to complete team objectives than score frags.Dark Virtue said:Tek, your sig shows you play a lot of Unreal Tournament. How do you justify the mindless fragging in that game?