
Wow. Just got done reading the debate in the Asatru thread, and it got me thinking. My experience was with Baptist (fundy/Independant) and Roman Catholicism, neither of which "believe" in predestination.
So forgive me Pop and ATown if I mess it up...but basically, predestination states that it was established before birth whether you would be saved or not, correct?
So the way I see it, there are three options (and forgive me if I use the wrong terms...I am trying):
(1) Free will--A person chooses or rejects Jehovah, without his interference.
(2) Limited Predestination--Jehovah "chooses" a person, yet the person would have to "walk the walk" to be saved.
(3) Full Predestination--Anton LeVey, Josef Stalin, and Madalin Murray O'Hair (a very strong atheist (as in "There are no gods, period)

Here are my problems with each one.
Free will kind of negates Jehovah being all knowing and all powerful. How can you have free will with an omnipotent, omnicient deity?
Limited predestination has the problem of Jehovah "choosing" someone, only to have them not do what they are supposed to...thus making an omnicient deity...not all knowing.
Full predestination means that no matter how good one is, and even if they have faith, one could still be in danger of hellfire. Goes against the whole idea of needing faith (or faith + works) to be saved.
It is late and I am tired, so if I messed up on anything, i will correct it.

I would like to hear from people on this...what does everyone believe, and how do you rectify your beliefs with the arguments (and feel free to post other aguments against the other ones if you want to too.)
Oh, and Happy New Year! to all
