[b said:
Quote[/b] ]Ill probably just end up picking sierra, and that includes dynamix.
Also, Sierra = Valve = Half Life.
Sierra is a good choice. They have been around forever and have made some good titles. I remember Sierra back when Liesure Suit Larry was the latest and greatest game around.
However, my choice would have to be Sony Online Entertainment or LucasArts. They are dominating the RPG (EverQuest, SWG) markets and maybe even the FPS market (JKII, Planetside) with some really good games.
EQ did suck with some serious problems, but it was/is still good enough to keep over 400,000 subscribers still paying to play. Personally I quit cause it wore me out with the endless timesinks it contained, but they are continually adding more to the game to keep ppl in.
I'm not an EQ champion by any means, even though I did have a lvl 65 Gnome Enchanter
, I'm just saying that from business standpoint they seem to be pretty saavy. Or is ruthless a better word? From a gameplay standpoint, they have much to fix. It seems that they are addressing what they did wrong with EQ in games like SWG and EQII.
You don't have to tell me how much Verant sux, I know.
Also Exo, Blizzard is good if you are into RTS games. But if you want a good FPS or RPG then they have nothing worthwhile to offer. That is why they aren't one of my favorite gaming companies. NOTE: I will probably revise that statement after WoW comes out. But then again, I may not, cause I'll probably be busy playing SWG