[b said:
Quote[/b] (mrpopdrinker @ Dec. 14 2003,5:53)]The only people it could really offend would be the atheists, and to be honest I cant see how they could really be offended all that much.
Honest opinion from an atheist:
I don't really care if you have "under god" in the pledge, nor do I care if my money says "in god we trust." It does bother the heck out of some atheists.
I
disagree with having those two things there, but it is not something that I feel strongly enough to fight for. Why? It is just words. The only thing I do feel is that the two phrases should be recognized for what they really are: propaganda from the cold war against the "godless" commies.
I don't care if you have a nativity scene in a park. As long as you allow Jews to put up a similar sized menorah, a muslim to put up...I dunno...a crescent moon, and you allow a pagan to put up a "birth of Mithral" display. And as long as I have the freedom of speech to laugh at all of them.
Forcing people to conform to your practices is wrong. Having a school run prayer is wrong. While it may not happen for a while, odds are that there will eventually be a school district with a non-christian majority, at which point, there could be school led prayer to, say Allah. So, isn't it better to just say "feel free to pray on your own?" And before somebody says it, no, it is not illegal to pray at school. It is just illegal for a school to
lead the prayer.
Finally, as a private company, Pepsi has every right to put the pledge without "under god" or include it as they see fit. Likewise, you have every right to buy Pepsi or switch to Coke.
Let the flames begin.