Cavinism

I'm not sure I understand your post. Perhaps you are unclear about the doctrine of total depravity and the doctrine of limited atonement?

Total depravity isn't predestination. Calvinism in it's whole represents predestination. Total depravity simply means that since Adam's sin, man is in a state where he is enslaved to sin and can do not good, and he is unable to come to God by his own will.

Limited atonement simply means that Jesus laid his life down for his sheep. His blood atoned for them whereas God pulled them out of this depraved state and turned them from slaves of sin, to slaves of righteousness.

Therefore they do not conflict.

LoJ:
"to say that Jesus came to die for the would be christians is just crap IMO"

Me:
How so? The point of Jesus's death was to redeem his people and to save his sheep. He says so himself (see my post addressing piet). I could say that "to say that Jesus came to die for everyone is just crap IMO. To say that Jesus' death attoned for everyone's sin, yet not everyone's sin is actually atoned for is ridiculous. To suggest that more is needed than Jesus's blood to save someone is ridiculous." Yep, I could say that ^_-

LoJ:
"Jesus died for the whole world, yes but some people choose to reject him, well by Total depravity that is wrong, because God predestined those that would believe thus those that would be saved. so did Jesus die for us all or just us Christians?"

If Jesus died for the whole world and it is our choice to accept that death or reject that death, what saves us? One could not say Jesus's blood, because more is required. Also, it should be advised where faith comes from (because I sense this being the next point of topic). Faith is a gift from God (Eph. 2:8).

Also, I believe the latter part of your post was a misinterpretation of Total depravity on your part. Total depravity isn't the doctrine that entails predestination. Calvinism as a whole entails this.
 
Who will believe in the son? Those who come to him and that is anyone who wished to. No I am asserting it is God's plan for everyone to go to heaven as hell was created for the devil and his angels.  (Matthew 25:41) However it is up to us whether or not we accept the plan. Read the rest of Romans 8 it usually helps if you read the whole thing. No I am not joking. I believe these terms such as predestination and the elect just show. A:God had a plan B: I believe elect just meens those that come to him. James 5:20 "remember whoever turns a sinner from the error of his ways will save him from death and cover a multitude of sins" I believe this is saying that by fullfilling the great comission we can lead anyone to Christ how am I wrong? I also should apologize for saying we serve seperate Gods as God spoke to me last night and told me that I should not have done that for various reasons. So I do apologize for that. Now in Epheisians 1:5 it says he predestined us according to his pleasure and will. Now as I have said before I believe God wants all men to be saved and you asked for proof. After doing some more study I found it. 1 Timothy 2:3-4 "This is good and pleases God our saviour who wants all men to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth" Now who is the truth the way and the light? Yeshua is. This is another reason why I cannot believe God would send anyone to hell.
 
Mrpopdrinker:
"Who will believe in the son? Those who come to him and that is anyone who wished to."

Me:
Calvinism does not go against this.

Mrpopdrinker:
"No I am asserting it is God's plan for everyone to go to heaven as hell was created for the devil and his angels.  (Matthew 25:41)"

Me:
I would not argue that hell wasn't created for the devil and his angels.  I could get into the different degrees of predestination, but only if it's necessary.  The important thing is that I am not disagreeing with this, nor have I.

However, I would argue that it was not God's plan for everyone to go to heaven.  If this was the case, why doens't it happen.  If God plans for something to happen, it does:

Job 42
2 "I know that you can do all things;
no plan of yours can be thwarted.

Mrpopdrinker:
"However it is up to us whether or not we accept the plan. "

Me:
If this were the case, it would mean two things:
1) We save ourselves.  God throws us a bone and it is up to us to save ourselves.  
2) Our actions are above God's plan.  

Both are absurd if you think about them.  

Mrpopdrinker:
"Read the rest of Romans 8 it usually helps if you read the whole thing. "

Me:
I have read Romans 8....
We can go into Romans 9 if you want...

I could exegete this, but it's blantantly obvious

Romans 9
1I speak the truth in Christ--I am not lying, my conscience confirms it in the Holy Spirit-- 2I have great sorrow and unceasing anguish in my heart. 3For I could wish that I myself were cursed and cut off from Christ for the sake of my brothers, those of my own race, 4the people of Israel. Theirs is the adoption as sons; theirs the divine glory, the covenants, the receiving of the law, the temple worship and the promises. 5Theirs are the patriarchs, and from them is traced the human ancestry of Christ, who is God over all, forever praised![1] Amen.
6It is not as though God's word had failed. For not all who are descended from Israel are Israel. 7Nor because they are his descendants are they all Abraham's children. On the contrary, "It is through Isaac that your offspring will be reckoned."[2] 8In other words, it is not the natural children who are God's children, but it is the children of the promise who are regarded as Abraham's offspring. 9For this was how the promise was stated: "At the appointed time I will return, and Sarah will have a son."[3]
10Not only that, but Rebekah's children had one and the same father, our father Isaac. 11Yet, before the twins were born or had done anything good or bad--in order that God's purpose in election might stand: 12not by works but by him who calls--she was told, "The older will serve the younger."[4] 13Just as it is written: "Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated."[5]
14What then shall we say? Is God unjust? Not at all! 15For he says to Moses,
  "I will have mercy on whom I have mercy,
      and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion."[6] 16It does not, therefore, depend on man's desire or effort, but on God's mercy. 17For the Scripture says to Pharaoh: "I raised you up for this very purpose, that I might display my power in you and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth."[7] 18Therefore God has mercy on whom he wants to have mercy, and he hardens whom he wants to harden.
19One of you will say to me: "Then why does God still blame us? For who resists his will?" 20But who are you, O man, to talk back to God? "Shall what is formed say to him who formed it, 'Why did you make me like this?' "[8] 21Does not the potter have the right to make out of the same lump of clay some pottery for noble purposes and some for common use?
22What if God, choosing to show his wrath and make his power known, bore with great patience the objects of his wrath--prepared for destruction? 23What if he did this to make the riches of his glory known to the objects of his mercy, whom he prepared in advance for glory-- 24even us, whom he also called, not only from the Jews but also from the Gentiles?


Christ came to redeem his people, Israel.  Paul confirms that he did so.

More:

30What then shall we say? That the Gentiles, who did not pursue righteousness, have obtained it, a righteousness that is by faith; 31but Israel, who pursued a law of righteousness, has not attained it. 32Why not? Because they pursued it not by faith but as if it were by works. They stumbled over the "stumbling stone." 33As it is written:
  "See, I lay in Zion a stone that causes men to stumble
      and a rock that makes them fall,
  and the one who trusts in him will never be put to shame."


Mrpopdrinker:
"I believe these terms such as predestination and the elect just show. A:God had a plan B: I believe elect just meens those that come to him."

Me:
The terms predestination and elect mean just that.  They are literal terms and mean their actual definition.  you can see hint of that in context, as well as the Greek.

Predestination does mean that God had a plan (has a plan).  That plan was to save his people.  I showed earlier quoting Romans that that plan is being fulfilled, and humans could not have thwarted it by our "freewill" as you assert, because the Bible teaches that nothing can thwart God's plan.  If God actively predestined something, thereby making his plan out, then it will come to pass, plain and simple.

Biblically, elect refers to the same thing as the sheep, and to the same thing as spiritual Israel.  The elect are those whom Christ died for and those who by God are able to come to Christ.  
Let's look at John 10 for a more clear understanding:

John 10
1"I tell you the truth, the man who does not enter the sheep pen by the gate, but climbs in by some other way, is a thief and a robber. 2The man who enters by the gate is the shepherd of his sheep. 3The watchman opens the gate for him, and the sheep listen to his voice. He calls his own sheep by name and leads them out. 4When he has brought out all his own, he goes on ahead of them, and his sheep follow him because they know his voice. 5But they will never follow a stranger; in fact, they will run away from him because they do not recognize a stranger's voice." 6Jesus used this figure of speech, but they did not understand what he was telling them.
7Therefore Jesus said again, "I tell you the truth, I am the gate for the sheep. 8All who ever came before me were thieves and robbers, but the sheep did not listen to them. 9I am the gate; whoever enters through me will be saved.[1] He will come in and go out, and find pasture. 10The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy; I have come that they may have life, and have it to the full.
11"I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep. 12The hired hand is not the shepherd who owns the sheep. So when he sees the wolf coming, he abandons the sheep and runs away. Then the wolf attacks the flock and scatters it. 13The man runs away because he is a hired hand and cares nothing for the sheep.
14"I am the good shepherd; I know my sheep and my sheep know me-- 15just as the Father knows me and I know the Father--and I lay down my life for the sheep. 16I have other sheep that are not of this sheep pen. I must bring them also. They too will listen to my voice, and there shall be one flock and one shepherd. 17The reason my Father loves me is that I lay down my life--only to take it up again. 18No one takes it from me, but I lay it down of my own accord. I have authority to lay it down and authority to take it up again. This command I received from my Father."
19At these words the Jews were again divided. 20Many of them said, "He is demon-possessed and raving mad. Why listen to him?"
21But others said, "These are not the sayings of a man possessed by a demon. Can a demon open the eyes of the blind?"
22Then came the Feast of Dedication[2] at Jerusalem. It was winter, 23and Jesus was in the temple area walking in Solomon's Colonnade. 24The Jews gathered around him, saying, "How long will you keep us in suspense? If you are the Christ,[3] tell us plainly."
25Jesus answered, "I did tell you, but you do not believe. The miracles I do in my Father's name speak for me, 26but you do not believe because you are not my sheep. 27My sheep listen to my voice; I know them, and they follow me. 28I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; no one can snatch them out of my hand. 29My Father, who has given them to me, is greater than all[4] ; no one can snatch them out of my Father's hand. 30I and the Father are one."

Biblically the sheep are those who are chosen beforehand acording to even this passage.  The sheep are those who were chosen and who would not follow the false messiah but will follow Christ, because they "know his voice." The sheep where those given to Christ by God, and who were secure in the father's hand so that nothing could snatch them out.   According to the passage, not everyone is a sheep.  Jesus told those particular people that they were not sheep.  He also says in John 6 that no one could come to him unless the father draws that person.  

John 6
44"No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him, and I will raise him up at the last day.

I do not have any greek resources with me, but this I am certain.  You can check it if you wish, any here who knows Greek.

The term "draws" used in this passage, is the same term that is used throughout the Bible in forceful passages.  One of which is Acts 16:19

"19When the owners of the slave girl realized that their hope of making money was gone, they seized Paul and Silas and dragged them into the marketplace to face the authorities"

Further, close attention on the passage in John 6:44 shows that Christ is claiming that those whom the father draws, Christ will raise up on the last day.  \

Mrpopdrinker:
"James 5:20 "remember whoever turns a sinner from the error of his ways will save him from death and cover a multitude of sins" I believe this is saying that by fullfilling the great comission we can lead anyone to Christ how am I wrong?"

Me:
We know from the Bible that we cannot save anyone.  By fulfilling the great commission we are merely using ourselves as a vessel.  We can present the God's word, but it is God who must open the heart of the other individual. The passage says that whoever "turns a sinner from error." We obviously do not have this ability so James must have meant something else.  I believe he was just pressing our need to witness, fulfilling our instrumental purposes of God as our tool.  When we witness, people do often become believers.  They are saved from death.  However, this is not because we changed them.  We merely presented God's word and he did what he did with that. So this passage is more of an indirect acomplishment of our witnessing.

Look at Isaiah 55:
11so is my word that goes out from my mouth: It will not return to me empty, but will accomplish what I desire and achieve the purpose for which I sent it.

Mrpopdrinker:
"also should apologize for saying we serve seperate Gods as God spoke to me last night and told me that I should not have done that for various reasons. So I do apologize for that."

Me:
Thank you.  

Mrpopdrinker:
"Now in Epheisians 1:5 it says he predestined us according to his pleasure and will."

Me:
Before I move on to your next argument I want to point something out.  What do you think is God's chief concern?  What does God care about more than anything.  The answer, of course, is his glory.  Mankind does not preceed this.

Mrpopdrinker:
"Now as I have said before I believe God wants all men to be saved and you asked for proof. After doing some more study I found it. 1 Timothy 2:3-4 "This is good and pleases God our saviour who wants all men to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth""

Me:
I will assume your position then attempt to prove it logically unsound with the rest of the Bible.  Then I will propose my exegesis which I believe to be the correct one.

Is it's God's plan for "all" (I use this term in the sense you are referring) to be saved?  If this was God's plan, then it would happen, for we know from Job 42:2 that God's plan cannot be thwarted.  Further, if this was God's plan, then Christ wouldn't have been made a stumbling block to nonbelievers (1Cor 1:23, Romans 9:32-33, 1Peter 2:8). "All" men (again "all" in your sense) would be able to believe. However, this is not the case according to John 12:40, John 6:44, John 10:26, Isaiah 55:11, Romans 8, Romans 9, 1Cor 2:14, et al. If God's desire is for "all" (again in your sense) to be saved, then why doesn't God give Christ us all for him to atone.

John 6
37All that the Father gives me will come to me, and whoever comes to me I will never drive away.

All who the Father gives the Son will come. How come not "all" in your sense comes?

I hope to have shown that looking at it through your perspective view is contradictory and cannot be true.

I will now exegete the correct meaning of the passage:

1 Timothy 2:3-4
This is good and pleases God our saviour who wants all men to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth

The Bible constantly refers to the word all as a boundary breaker between both Jews and gentiles, or showing that it is people from all nations and not just the limitness of the Jews.

Matthew 10
22All men will hate you because of me, but he who stands firm to the end will be saved.

This passage obviously doesn't mean "all" in your sense because it would be impossible. They would have to hate themselves, since they are infact men also, and it would mean that no one would be saved because they would all hate Jesus.

The passage above simply refers to God's desire that all kinds of men. Kings, peasents, Jews, Gentiles. God shows no such partiallity. And those whom he desires to be saved, he has predestined, according to his pleasure ^_-
 
Did Jesus die for the sins of the entire population of man?
What did YESHUA actually say?
St. John 16:7-9 The Holy Ghost will reprove the word of sin, because, they BELIEVE NOT ON ME;
So then The Holy Spirit BRINGS JUDGEMENT ON THE WORLD, but you can not see Him with fleshly eyes.
So then who is it you will see bringing a judgement on the world by THE HOLY GHOST you can not see?
It is the THREE WITNESSES, even the avenger of GOd, who sits to judge and rule the world at the right hand of Jesus/Yeshua.
Jesus did not die for the sins of all the world, ONLY THOSE PREDESTINATED TO THE BODY OF CHRIST. AMEN
The entire HOly Bible is ONLY given to those PREDESTINATED to THE BODY OF CHRIST JESUS.
ONLY THOSE CHILDREN DID He COME TO SAVE THEIR SOULS FROM A PHYSICAL DEATH.
NONE OTHERS.
THERE IS A BETTER WAY TO ENTER INTO THE KINGDOME OF HEAVEN, IT IS BY TRANSLATION. AMEN
i am nothing0.
JESUS IS THE LORD1PRAISE THE LORD1THE LORD YESHUA. AMEN
St. John 3:18 "HE that believeth on Him is not condemned; but he thAt believeth not is CONDEMNED ALREADY,"
Please take note of the use of the word "ALREADY".
It is an easy thing to discern THE BODY OF CHRIST(THOSE OF A WILLING spirit) from those NOT of THE BODY(THOSE WITH AN UNWILLING spirit), just ask them to UTTER:JESUS/YESHUA IS THE LORD or THE LORD JESUS/YESHUA.
That will surfice, or is Paul according to you a liar?
i am nothing0 and know by THE HOLY GHOST, Paul is not a liar. amen
JESUS IS THE LORD1PRAISE THE LORD1THE LORD YESHUA. AMEN
 
[b said:
Quote[/b] ]Before I move on to your next argument I want to point something out. What do you think is God's chief concern? What does God care about more than anything. The answer, of course, is his glory. Mankind does not preceed this.
I dont have much time but there is one point I will make. Actually mankind does go before his glory. God is love and love is not selfish and God created us for personal realationship. Therefore he is more caring about us then his glory.
[b said:
Quote[/b] ]If this was the case, why doens't it happen. If God plans for something to happen, it does:
I have one more point actually. The reason we dont all come to him is because of freewill. God forces no one to do anything. I am sure he has a plan for me but it is up to me whether or not I accept it. I will go more into this later.
 
(previously) me:
What do you think is God's chief concern?  What does God care about more than anything.  The answer, of course, is his glory.  Mankind does not preceed this.

Mrpopdrinker:
"Actually mankind does go before his glory. God is love and love is not selfish and God created us for personal realationship. Therefore he is more caring about us then his glory."

Me:
Actually, the Bible teaches that God's glory is His chief concern.  
Man's cheif condemnation comes from the failure to recognize God's glory as is seen in Romans 1:21:

Romans 1
21For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened.

The glory of God and his name matters so much to Him that the Father allowed the Son to be crucified in order to atone for the sins of the elect.  If God's chief concern was for mankind, we would not have needed the shedding of blood to wash away our sins.  It is becuase God is just and cares for His name more than us, that he required blood for the atonement of our sins.  Even if that blood was his Sons.

If we mattered more than God's glory, God would take us as sinners and we wouldn't need a redeemer.  However, God cannot do that, nor can he be with sin because his Glory is more important.

Our whole purpose for being created was for God's glory.  
We were created for His glory, some are redeemed for His glory, and some are reprobate for His glory.  

Ephesians 2:10
10 For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand so that we would walk in them.

Romans 9
22What if God, choosing to show his wrath and make his power known, bore with great patience the objects of his wrath--prepared for destruction?

God's glory preceeds us, for we were made for the very purpose of his glory and his pleasure.  

God is love.  God is also jealousy (exodus 34:14).  God, above all is a jealous God for his glory.  

This does not contradict God's love for us in anyway though.  God could have chose any way he wished to bring glory to his name and he chose to redeem fallen man.  This, my friend is love.  

Conclusion: God's glory is more important than God's instrument chosen for His glory.

Mrpopdrinker:
The reason we dont all come to him is because of freewill. God forces no one to do anything. I am sure he has a plan for me but it is up to me whether or not I accept it. I will go more into this later.

Me:
You have not proved nor attempted to argue that we have freewill yet. You are presupposing freewill in order to prove freewill.  Your argument is circular.

Finally, again I say, if God has a plan, it will come to pass because it CANNOT be thwarted.  If we screw up God's plan, then that is thwarting it, which is impossible.  You don't accept God's forordained plan like you accept a money order or a prize.  If God forordained for something to happen, it is IMPOSSIBLE for it not to happen.
 
Our cheif purpose is to glorify God. God allowed his son to be sacrificed to atone for the sins of all men not just the lect as there is no elect. Our whole purpose of being created was for fellowship with God he dident want mindless drones so he gave us freewill. Do you think it was God's plan for Adam and Eve to eat the fruit? It wasent but we have freewill so they did. Actually shedding of blood is required because God and sin do not mix. This is easily proven because the old covenent people could not go to the third heaven because they were not cleansed so they went to Avrahams bosom instead. God's plan was to provide a way to get out if sin bondage. God has two wills. That which will ultimatly happen such as the rapture and that which he gives us a choice to do. He may want me to be a pastor but I may want to be a computer guy. It is up to me whether or not I follow the fathers plan.
 
Mrpopdrinker:
"Our cheif purpose is to glorify God."

Great, that is completely Biblical. It is also completely contradictory to the assumption that man preceeds God's glory.

If man's purpose is to glorify God, then man has a higher purpose than himself, and that which is man's purpose or goal, is higher than man. If man's goal is to glorify God, then that glory is higher than man, because that is man's goal. Therefore, God's glory is higher than man.

Mrpopdrinker:
"God allowed his son to be sacrificed to atone for the sins of all men not just the lect as there is no elect."

Me:
This position is completely unbiblical as I have shown it to be, and I will do so again.

Is there an "elect?"

Matthew 24
22If those days had not been cut short, no one would survive, but for the sake of the elect those days will be shortened

Matthew 24
24For false Christs and false prophets will appear and perform great signs and miracles to deceive even the elect--if that were possible

Matthew 24
31And he will send his angels with a loud trumpet call, and they will gather his elect from the four winds, from one end of the heavens to the other.

Mark 13
20If the Lord had not cut short those days, no one would survive. But for the sake of the elect, whom he has chosen, he has shortened them.

Romans 11
7What then? What Israel sought so earnestly it did not obtain, but the elect did. The others were hardened.

I could go on and on, but you can find, by looking in any biblical online search engine for the word "elect" there are numerous accounts. There is a such thing as the "elect." To say that there isn't is to disagree with the Bible.

Also, once again you assert that Christ died for all, and not just the elect. I have shown all of your arguments prior to be logically unsound concerning this, so this is mere assumption on your part.

I ask again, if Christ's atonement is for all, are all men saved? Why does Christ preach that he died for his sheep? Why does Christ preach that not all are sheep? Why does Christ preach that only the sheep can come to him? Read my previous post considering Jesus's words in John.

Mrpopdrinker:
Our whole purpose of being created was for fellowship with God he dident want mindless drones so he gave us freewill.

Me:
Our purpose was for God's glory. You agreed with me on this, have you changed your mind?
Also, please quit assuming that we have free will if you are not going to make an argument for it. Further, this is sad rhetoric.

Mrpopdrinker:
"Do you think it was God's plan for Adam and Eve to eat the fruit?"

Me:
I believe the way God has chosen to glorify himself was through the redemption of His people.

Mrpopdrinker:
"It wasent but we have freewill so they did."

Me:
Prove all 3 of those implications:
1) It wasn't God's plan for Adam to eat the fruit.
2) We have freewill
3) They have freewill

And please quit arguing by assumptions. You are again slipping into the "you are wrong because I disagree with you and I'm right so haha" mode.

Mrpopdrinker:
"Actually shedding of blood is required because God and sin do not mix."

Me:
Actually while it is true that God and sin do not mix, you do not get to my point(s).

Shedding of blood is required because it was the previous requirement of God to show His justness. God could technically forgive sins without the shedding of blood, but this represents His justness, and His justness, the glory of His name.

Further, it is true that God and sin do not mix. However, God will not look upon sin. Again, this is because He's glory is the most important thing to Him.

Sort of like an "I'm too high to stoop down to even look upon that level" kind of thing, which God has every right to of course.

Mrpopdrinker:
God has two wills. That which will ultimatly happen such as the rapture and that which he gives us a choice to do. He may want me to be a pastor but I may want to be a computer guy. It is up to me whether or not I follow the fathers plan."

I agree that God does have 2 wills, a sovereign will and a preceptive will. However, the redemption of his elect is definately a sovereign will. It is forceful and will happen. I have argued this throrougly ahead, why don't you respond to any of those arguments?
 
I should have said there is no elect in the way you perceive it. The ones that are not sheep are the ones that reject Yeshua by their own freewill. Do you know that you can have more then one purpose? We are to have fellowship with God and we are to glorify his name in all that we do. Salvation is a gift and is available for all. However you have to go get the gift.
[b said:
Quote[/b] ]Prove all 3 of those implications:
1) It wasn't God's plan for Adam to eat the fruit.
2) We have freewill
3) They have freewill
Easy. God commanded Adam not to eat the fruit. He did so he had freewill. God dident change man kind in any way so we have freewill too. No God cannot look upon sin because if he looked at us we would die. Infact I think that happend when some people opened the ark of the covenent but I am not sure where. It is his will that all come to him but he does not enforce it. I believe you called it a perceptive will. I thought I did argue those?
 
Mrpopdrinker:
"The ones that are not sheep are the ones that reject Yeshua by their own freewill."

Me:
You are not reading my posts, mrpopdrinker. I explicitly proved from the context of the Bible earlier that those who reject Jesus, do so because they are not sheep.  Not that they are not sheep because they reject Jesus, but the other way around. If you wish to argue against my proof, scroll up to the post you missed.

Also, once again, you assume freewill in this implication.......

Mrpopdrinker:
"Do you know that you can have more then one purpose? "

Me:
I am not speaking of purpose as in the purpose of the tools of a vacuum, mrpopdrinker, and I believe you know that.  Our purpose of our creation was to glorify God and I have shown that because of that, and other Biblical references, God's glory preceeds man.  Read my posts....

Mrpopdrinker:
"Salvation is a gift and is available for all. However you have to go get the gift."

Me:
Prove this!  You have asserted it again and again, and I argue against it Biblically, yet you make no counter-arguments and ignore my own.  If this is what you believe, and if you believe it to be Biblical, then show me!

Mrpopdrinker:
"Easy. God commanded Adam not to eat the fruit. He did so he had freewill."

Me:
Wow...
This hardly proves anything but your lack of understanding of Calvinism.  God commands us to do many things that we don't do.  It's again a matter of his preceptive and sovereign will which you claim to have knowledge of.  This is obviously a matter of preceptive will, while his sovereign will of glorifying himself emerged.

Mrpopdrinker:
"No God cannot look upon sin because if he looked at us we would die."

Me:
God cannot look upon sin because if he would, we would die? While it is true that we would die if our sinful bodies saw the glory of God, it is not true that he is bound to not look at us by our lives.  

Mrpopdrinker:
"It is his will that all come to him but he does not enforce it. I believe you called it a perceptive will."

Me:
God's will that his elect would be saved, is infact a sovereign will.  I explained the context of the greek earlier and his forcefulness of bringing the elect to him.  Perhaps you didn't read that post?  Also, the act of predestining something, by definition, is a sovereign act.  

The summary of our argument thus far, is you assert something and I disprove it.  You then assert the same thing that I disproved, in argument to my exegesis, without even reason behind it.  This is is counterproductive.  I have to continually repeat myself while it does no good and you keep asserting that "I'm wrong because man has freewill" -- or something to that extent (still without proving the whole freewill thing) -- and the reader doesn't get anything out of this but you making tons of assumptions and not reading my arguments.  

If you have quarrel with my arguments, take the Scripture that I posted and show me where I am wrong at it.  Yes, it has now added up to a profuse amount, but only because you have ignored them previously.  And for doing so, I believe that you owe me, and your beliefs this.  If you do not do this, then our discussion is over, for we will go in the same circle we have been delving in, whereby  I spend over an hour on some of these posts, making sure to include scripture and to soundly prove my position, and you come and say that I'm wrong because you assume freewill. So argue my points and counter exegete the scripture I have provided, or the discussion between You and I is over, and I will start another thread inviting another user for debate.  

I don't really see you changing your form of argument so I'll conclude and say that if you cannot argue against something such as Calvinism, and on top of that you don't even understand it, don't go about making threads attacking it.  Unless you can defend your position (which you have shown unable to do), don't attack the opposite.  And further, my question would be, why believe something that you cannot defend, whereby it's contrary position seems to be able to be defended by YOUR book of authority?  

While it may appear quite humorous to some, it's quite laborous to me and with the very minimal chance of producing any kind of fruit in such a "debate" as this one has been. Therefore, if you can't defend your position, this needs not go on anymore.

*Note, I'm not assuming that this argument between mrpopdrinker and I proved, that I'm right and he's wrong (though I certainly believe those two implications). I simply believe it to mean that *he* could not argue his position.
 
Now God has just revealed this to me. In unconditional election which is God chose the elect unto salvation you prove this with Ephesians 1. Now it says he adopted us. Now to say that meens save us would make no sense. So i believe Ephesians 1:5 meens God planned to ingraft the gentiles into the branch which is Yisrael. Now Romans 8:29-30 I believe is just saying God has called some men to work and do great things. We are all to fulfill the great comission but not everyone can be a Kenneth Hagen. As we all have different gifts. Now you keep saying I have been assuming freewill I do not assume freewill I proved it but you did not accept that. Now you say that God's main concern is his Glory. So that must meen that it is his ultimate will that his people do not make or worhsip idols which meens he will force them not to. However you see how his people back in the OT days made and worshipped idols. God of course forgave them if they would repent.
 
I'm not even going to respond with another argument.  You again prove that you have not been reading my posts.  For you to even think that you proved freewill, baffles me beyond reason.  I have posted the evidence adn you have not responded.  You are basically responding to yourself in yoru very first post because you keep implying that the only verse I used was ephesians 1.  Anyway, this debate is over.  Let the reader decide for himself, and if anyone else has any questions about Calvinism or wishes to argue against it, I will respond to him.

Nevermind, I did not realize that you were 15. I didn't mean to be harsh on any of my posts but I really thought that you were playing with me trying to agitate me. I apologize for that. Anyway, still if anyone else has any argument with me, I'll respond.
 
I did not imply that Ephsians 1 is the only thing. I said what both the points for unconditional election really ment. And yes I did prove freewill. You just dident accept it so to you I dident. But calvinism has been debated for the past countless years so I guess it wasent me that is going to stop it if anyone.
 
[b said:
Quote[/b] (mrpopdrinker @ Oct. 13 2003,12:28)]Nothing would please God more then if we all came to him.
Regarding your point that nothing would please God more then if we all came to him.

Hmmmm. I wonder. Just looking at many of the parables of Our Lord we can see that His expectations are low. Why there are five or six ways for the seed to die, or only one possibility that it should not. Then we have the damned goats and the blessed sheep. The tares and the wheat.

Then we have our own common sense that tells us that there are certainly people whom we can't stand on earth, even on a temporary basis, whom we would be appalled to find as our eternal neighbors in heaven. As you say, we have our Free Will. God will not utterly transform a soul so that it could be worthy of Heaven -- that would be to eradicate its Free Will. Souls must be worthy of Heaven of their own Free Will.

I don't see it. All those gun nuts who talk about the survival of the strongest and the overthrow of government and who glory in their ability to exploit all those within their own society and despise all those who aren't -- I do not see how God would be pleased if this class of people were suddenly to start beating on the Doors of Heaven. A "Heaven" that would harbor such souls would not be a Heaven for the rest. They already run things down here. We don't need them to pollute our afterlives also.

Jesus spoke of Lavarus and the Rich Man. The Rich Man believed in God and spoke of Abraham. He would not be sent to Hell because he didn't believe. He did. He was sent to Hell because of his selfish personality.

If you are obnoxious enough, no amount of Faith or belief will Save you. Heaven has to have some minimal standard of decorum and accepted behavior, or it won't be Heaven.
 
You can have faith in anything you want, it's thruogh Jeses we are saved and worthy enough to get into heaven. His blood washed us clean.
 
[b said:
Quote[/b] (Leo Volont @ Oct. 16 2003,2:52)]If you are obnoxious enough, no amount of Faith or belief will Save you.  Heaven has to have some minimal standard of decorum and accepted behavior, or it won't be Heaven.
I believe you have a mistaken view of faith in relation to good works.  You are correct that we must produce good works in order to get into heaven, but your equation is incorrect.  

You assert that we must have

faith + goodworks = heaven.  

I believe that you may an incorrect view on what true faith is.  Throughout the book of James, we learn that our works, and fruits of our faith.  Therefore if a man produces no fruit, we can conclude that he has not faith, for the fruit produced in side of a believer is fruit produced from Christ, and if there is none, then it can be concluded that Christ is not present in the believer.

James 2
14What good is it, my brothers, if a man claims to have faith but has no deeds? Can such faith save him?

James 2
17In the same way, faith by itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead.

18But someone will say, “You have faith; I have deeds.”
Show me your faith without deeds, and I will show you my faith by what I do.

James is saying here that there is no such thing as faith without deeds.  He is basically rebuking the reader from believing that since they believed in Christ but thought that they didn't have to follow him to go to heaven.  He is saying that this isn't the biblical sense of "belief" or of "faith."

This shows us that

faith -> goodworks (fruit)

and that it is not the case that goodworks must be added with faith for heaven, but that true faith will yeild good works, and the way to conclude whether or not there is true faith, is by looking for the goodworks (matthew 7:15-20).

This is what Christ means is Matthew 3

Matthew 3
10The ax is already at the root of the trees, and every tree that does not produce good fruit will be cut down and thrown into the fire.

It is not that goodworks is required for our salvation, but that true faith will produce these works, and we can tell whether or not a person has true faith, by looking at their fruit.  Compare this to Matthew 7:15-20.

So thus, it is our faith that produces our obedience

Romans 1
5Through him and for his name's sake, we received grace and apostleship to call people from among all the Gentiles to the obedience that comes from faith.

Romans 3
22This righteousness from God comes through faith in Jesus Christ to all who believe.

2 Corinthians 1
24Not that we lord it over your faith, but we work with you for your joy, because it is by faith you stand firm.

2 Corinthians 13
5Examine yourselves to see whether you are in the faith; test yourselves. Do you not realize that Christ Jesus is in you--unless, of course, you fail the test?

1 Thessalonians 1
3We continually remember before our God and Father your work produced by faith, your labor prompted by love, and your endurance inspired by hope in our Lord Jesus Christ

1 Corinthians 4
2Now it is required that those who have been given a trust must prove faithful.

^^I ran across this one just now.  What does it mean to prove faithful?  It simply means that true faith will show something.  True faith shows fruit as shown above.  

Throughout these passages, Paul and James are not contradicting one another, but James is confirming what Paul said basically, and rebuking those who believe they could have faith without works, saying that there is no such thing.

Conclusion:

faith -> goodworks = heaven

True faith yields goodworks, and true faith is what gets us to heaven by grace.
 
Romans 14:23
everything that does not come from faith is sin.

Faking the good works, doesn't mean that the works are good, but simply means that they are counterfeit. Counterfeit works are not the same thing as geniune good works, but are infact evil. This is why the nonchristian does no good deeds.
 
Back
Top