ppar3566
New Member
Imagine that - non-Christians being non-legalistic and it works out fine.
Thanks for the good advice ppar3566. Take care down-under.
Made me laugh and raise an eyebrow.
It is the natural way in which it is done that works so well. A good example is where a new member dropped the f-bomb useing the usually tricks to get around the filter and one of the officers quick as anything lol'd at the joke but then said something along the lines of "now now we do not have that sort of gutter talk here". I have found that works so much better than "that language is completely inappropriate, you have been warned". But again it is a case by case sort of thing and depends on the history of those involved.
One last thing before i go. I always think you should bring these sort of things up with officers first but also maintain a benifit of the doubt policy. I wasn't there but I know that sometimes I have read comments in-game and thought they were rude or teasing but found out later they were not. It is extremely difficult with online stuff as all non-verbal communication is excluded (remembering that non-verbal accounts for 90% of communication). This requires both writer and recipient to ber careful and not read to much into things. Sometimes i have written the same thing twice by accedent or said stuff in ally chat that was meant for team chat (stuff i wouldn't normally say in ally chat). It is just one of those things that happen.
Last edited: