K
Kohael <PC>
Guest
"Whats top risk with christianity? sanity."
I'd disagree here. I personally think that it's a personality type, coupled with lack of emotional and intellectual maturity, that makes any religious preference, including agnosticism and atheism (And yes, even Wicca), infuriating and possibly dangerous.
Crashing a board in the manner you did evinces such a personality type, by the way.
I'd disagree here. I personally think that it's a personality type, coupled with lack of emotional and intellectual maturity, that makes any religious preference, including agnosticism and atheism (And yes, even Wicca), infuriating and possibly dangerous.
Crashing a board in the manner you did evinces such a personality type, by the way.
minotesvardet
New Member
Tony, Dude
I can sort of see where you're coming from, but I totally do not agree. God is there. At moments when I doubt that, I think like this--when I'm really down, He helps me. He sent me my best friend, who keeps me in constant check with everything I do.
We were created to glorify God. That is why we're here.
hehe, remind me to read the entire thread before I post...could get myself in trouble.......
I can sort of see where you're coming from, but I totally do not agree. God is there. At moments when I doubt that, I think like this--when I'm really down, He helps me. He sent me my best friend, who keeps me in constant check with everything I do.
We were created to glorify God. That is why we're here.
hehe, remind me to read the entire thread before I post...could get myself in trouble.......
D
Dude
Guest
heres another one , who created god?
By the way tonytiger is not me replying for me as that is unbelieveably sad.
By the way tonytiger is not me replying for me as that is unbelieveably sad.
LionOfJudah
Member, Dreamcast Fishing Guru
the all encompasing question eh
What came before that?
at a certain point you will have to say i do not know or admit there is a god that created the tiny ball of particles or that maybe it was the distruction of another deminsion ripping a hole into the fabric of reality and thus letting a little bit of their matter into our demension and thus creating the big bang, but then you ask what made that demension.
What came before that?
at a certain point you will have to say i do not know or admit there is a god that created the tiny ball of particles or that maybe it was the distruction of another deminsion ripping a hole into the fabric of reality and thus letting a little bit of their matter into our demension and thus creating the big bang, but then you ask what made that demension.
God only has to be created if you think in human terms.
Maybe in the "Realm" or "Plane" in which God exists does not have death, creation, or any of that sort. We think in finite terms because we are finite beings. We see something like a piece of art and think, "Who made it?" We do the same with God. "Well, who made Him?" God didn't have to be created because in His realm, creation doesn't exist. Hard to comprehend, because we have such a small capacity of understanding compared to the supernatural.
Just like this. Try to imagine "nothing". You can't. You always imagine "something". It is impossible to imagine "nothing".
Our minds can't comprehend nothingness, while God most likely can. We're too absorbed in our own selves to see beyond flesh, blood, and bone.
"Think outside the body," as I've been told before
Maybe in the "Realm" or "Plane" in which God exists does not have death, creation, or any of that sort. We think in finite terms because we are finite beings. We see something like a piece of art and think, "Who made it?" We do the same with God. "Well, who made Him?" God didn't have to be created because in His realm, creation doesn't exist. Hard to comprehend, because we have such a small capacity of understanding compared to the supernatural.
Just like this. Try to imagine "nothing". You can't. You always imagine "something". It is impossible to imagine "nothing".
Our minds can't comprehend nothingness, while God most likely can. We're too absorbed in our own selves to see beyond flesh, blood, and bone.
"Think outside the body," as I've been told before
K
Kohael <PC>
Guest
It stands to reason that something must've been first.
Therefore, one can say "Nothing created God, God was first."
One can also say that, "Nothing created the universe, the universe was here first."
Therefore, asking the question "What was here first?" shows nothing either way.
Therefore, one can say "Nothing created God, God was first."
One can also say that, "Nothing created the universe, the universe was here first."
Therefore, asking the question "What was here first?" shows nothing either way.
D
dwgpreach
Guest
Just for your information. You can have LIGHT without a body source such as the sun. A little scientific research will support this...(it is called "Cosmic Light")...OR you can just read Genesis. HAha[b said:
K
Kohael <PC>
Guest
"Just for your information. You can have LIGHT without a body source such as the sun. A little scientific research will support this...(it is called "Cosmic Light")...OR you can just read Genesis. HAha"
However, night and day are defined by the sun. As 'cosmic light', by it's nature, exists during both night and day, it can't seperate the two.
However, night and day are defined by the sun. As 'cosmic light', by it's nature, exists during both night and day, it can't seperate the two.
G
Guest
Guest
dwgpreach- Welcome to the forum
Maybe.However,Genesis 1:5b says:'So the evening and the morning were the first day.
It could mean the creation of the 24-hour period since Gen.1:14 says:'Then God said,"Let there be lights in the firmament of the heavens to divide the day from the night....
So its possible God created the 24-hour period first and then came back and made: 'the greater light to rule the day,and the lesser light to rule the night.'Gen. 1:16b
Alien2385
[b said:
Maybe.However,Genesis 1:5b says:'So the evening and the morning were the first day.
It could mean the creation of the 24-hour period since Gen.1:14 says:'Then God said,"Let there be lights in the firmament of the heavens to divide the day from the night....
So its possible God created the 24-hour period first and then came back and made: 'the greater light to rule the day,and the lesser light to rule the night.'Gen. 1:16b
Alien2385
M
Mr_Eon
Guest
Is it worth it, at this point, to say that the Sun is the only source of light (apart from the starlight) and that the Moonlight is merely reflected sunlight?
So actually there was only one light source and one reflector set up...
So actually there was only one light source and one reflector set up...
G
Guest
Guest
Soooo...I guess the moon is the lesser light
Alien
Alien
D
dwgpreach
Guest
Actually night and day or to be more exact "morning and evening" have more to do with time....24 Hour period than they do with light....Ask the people who live in Northern Alaska. ....Or just ask Genesis. THANK YOU FOR THE WELCOME "ALIEN".[b said:
D
dwgpreach
Guest
The moon actually may produce its own light though a very small amount....I know I am being technical ...but accuracy is more important than cuteness....[b said:
MeanMrMustard
New Member
[b said:
Um... no it doesn't.
D
dwgpreach
Guest
Of course it might. Crack a science book (all Scientists realize this. NASA says the moon may have a little bit of its own light. )....read Genesis the moon is called the "lesser light", not the "lesser reflector". HAHa it is amazing howquickly we get sidetracked.[b said:
K
Kohael <PC>
Guest
Crack 'a science book'?
What science book?
I've run extensive google searches for moon + reflected light, and everybody seems to think that the moon isn't intrinsically bright, but reflects light from the sun. This reflects what we know about the moon being a big chunk of rock. While it's certainly possible that the moon is intrinsically bright, some sort of reference will be required for us to believe that fact.
BTW, your "HA ha" is not endearing you to the greater board community. I ask your patience with lesser beings such as we, who fail to comprehend your great wisdom.
What science book?
I've run extensive google searches for moon + reflected light, and everybody seems to think that the moon isn't intrinsically bright, but reflects light from the sun. This reflects what we know about the moon being a big chunk of rock. While it's certainly possible that the moon is intrinsically bright, some sort of reference will be required for us to believe that fact.
BTW, your "HA ha" is not endearing you to the greater board community. I ask your patience with lesser beings such as we, who fail to comprehend your great wisdom.