What Bible translation do you use?

What Bible translation do you use? -

  • Niv

    Votes: 11 100.0%
  • KJV

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • NKJV

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • CJB

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Darby

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • NASB

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Message

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Amplified

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    11
I put 'other' because I like to use multiple versions. I'll go online to biblegateway:

http://www.biblegateway.com/cgi-bin/bible/

And I'll generally read a scripture in NIV, The Message, Amplified, Contemporary English, and Young's Literal. I do that because I cannot read the bible in its original form, so I compensate by reading the different wordings of the same scripture. It helps to give volume and better understanding to what I'm reading.
 
[b said:
Quote[/b] ]I like to use multiple versions
Thats not a bad idea. Seeing it in different wordings can help you understand things a bit better. I am going to get a CJB soon because it is closer to the original than most or as far as I know anyway. Although I hope to one day learn Greek and Hebrew so I can read it in its original form.
 
I guess I'm just Old school, I go with either KJV traditional or NKJV. Generally the latter, but I enjoy delving into the KJV on occasion. The NRSV is something I rarely use, due to a couple of reasons. Gah, of COURSE I can't remembe them NOW, but a few years ago I went on a crusade of sorts to discover which translation was "right" for me. I made a huge list of reasons why I didn't like the others and amazingly, contrary to popular use, I found that I found the most things "wrong" with NIV. Not saying the TEXTS were wrong at all, just...Iono. Somethin' sat funny with me about it.

I'll have to go find that list and like...scan it or something, then I can get it up on my webserver if you guys would like to see MY reasoning about the whole thing. Promise it's an interesting read :P (If it's able to be comprehended. I'm bad about using very...Weird shorthand.)

::Shrug::
 
Just some food for thought....


WHOLE Bible verses deleted in the NIV

The following WHOLE verses have been removed in the NIV--whether in the text or footnotes...over 40 IN ALL!!!


Matthew 12:47 -- removed in the footnotes


Matthew 17:21 -- COMPLETELY removed [also deleted from the Jehovah's Witness "Bible"]. What are you NIV readers missing?
"Howbeit this kind goeth not out but by prayer and fasting."


Matthew 18:11 -- COMPLETELY removed [also deleted from the Jehovah's Witness "Bible"]. What are you NIV readers missing?
"For the Son of man is come to save that which was lost."


Matthew 21:44 -- removed in the footnotes


Matthew 23:14 -- COMPLETELY removed [also deleted from the Jehovah's Witness "Bible"]. What are you NIV readers missing?
"Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation."


Mark 7:16 -- COMPLETELY removed [also deleted from the Jehovah's Witness "Bible"]. What are you NIV readers missing?
"If any man have ears to hear, let him hear."


Mark 9:44 -- COMPLETELY removed [also deleted from the Jehovah's Witness "Bible"]. What are you NIV readers missing?
"Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched."


Mark 9:46 -- COMPLETELY removed [also deleted from the Jehovah's Witness "Bible"]. What are you NIV readers missing?
"Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched."


Mark 11:26 -- COMPLETELY removed [also deleted from the Jehovah's Witness "Bible"]. What are you NIV readers missing?
"But if ye do not forgive, neither will your Father which is in heaven forgive your trespasses."


Mark 15:28 -- COMPLETELY removed [also deleted from the Jehovah's Witness "Bible"]. What are you NIV readers missing?
"And the scripture was fulfilled, which saith, And he was numbered with the transgressors."


Mark 16:9-20 (all 12 verses) -- There is a line separating the last 12 verses of Mark from the main text. Right under the line it says: [The two most reliable early manuscripts do not have Mark 16:9-20] (NIV, 1978 ed.) The Jehovah's Witness "Bible" also places the last 12 verses of Mark as an appendix of sorts.


Luke 17:36 -- COMPLETELY removed [also deleted from the Jehovah's Witness "Bible"]. What are you NIV readers missing?
"Two men shall be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left."


Luke 22:44 -- removed in the footnotes


Luke 22:43 -- removed in the footnotes


Luke 23:17 -- COMPLETELY removed [also deleted from the Jehovah's Witness "Bible"]. What are you NIV readers missing?
"(For of necessity he must release one unto them at the feast.)"


John 5:4 -- COMPLETELY removed [also deleted from the Jehovah's Witness "Bible"]. What are you NIV readers missing?
"For an angel went down at a certain season into the pool, and troubled the water: whosoever then first after the troubling of the water stepped in was made whole of whatsoever disease he had."


John 7:53-8:11 -- removed in the footnotes


Acts 8:37 -- COMPLETELY removed [also deleted from the Jehovah's Witness "Bible"]. It's deletion makes one think that people can be baptized and saved without believing on the Lord Jesus Christ. Sounds Catholic. What are you NIV readers missing?
"And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God."


Acts 15:34 -- COMPLETELY removed [also deleted from the Jehovah's Witness "Bible"]. What are you NIV readers missing?
"Notwithstanding it pleased Silas to abide there still."


Acts 24:7 -- COMPLETELY removed [also deleted from the Jehovah's Witness "Bible"]. What are you NIV readers missing?
"But the chief captain Lysias came upon us, and with great violence took him away out of our hands,"


Acts 28:29 -- COMPLETELY removed [also deleted from the Jehovah's Witness "Bible"]. What are you NIV readers missing?
"And when he had said these words, the Jews departed, and had great reasoning among themselves."


Romans 16:24 -- COMPLETELY removed [also deleted from the Jehovah's Witness "Bible"]. What are you NIV readers missing?
"The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you all. Amen."

I John 5:7 -- Vitally important phrase COMPLETELY removed [also deleted from the Jehovah's Witness "Bible"]. In the NIV it says,

"For there are three that testify:"
Compare the NIV reading with the following Jehovah's Witness reading--

"For there are three witness bearers,"
What are you NIV readers missing? What does the real Bible say?

"For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one."
This is one of the GREATEST verses testifying of the trinity. That is why the Jehovah's Witnesses leave it out. They do not believe in the trinity and they do not believe that Jesus is God. Why does the NIV leave it out...? Whole books have been written on the manuscript evidence that supports inclusion of this verse in the Bible. Reader, do you believe in the triunity of God? If so, then this deletion should offend you. People are playing around with the Bible and it ain't funny.



http://www.jesus-is-lord.com/nivdelet.htm
 
Wow.

I hate to admit it, but, there is could be something there. Go read 1 John 5:7-8 in the NIV and compare to KJV. The meaning of those verses change. But before you go jumping onto a bandwagon somewhere, the NLT version adds a footnote:

[b said:
Quote[/b] ]5:7 Some very late manuscripts add in heaven--the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit, and these three are one. And we have three witnesses on earth.

Also, the article references the "real bible." In otherwords, you are dealing again with peoples opinions. The author of the article may prefer to go by the other versions for their inclusion, which may have been insiduously added. Which is as likely as the other version having them covertly omitted.

Go with the version that speaks to your spirit. I keep a few translations around as well. As has been mentioned before, having different versions simply adds (not detracts) meaning and understanding.
smile.gif


Keep the blue side up!
 
Heh, see CCGR? I'm not losing my mind, I do know what I was talking about!
biggrin.gif
.

Haha.

Yea, I'm too lazy to read all the verses you said were edited out, but I do remember something particular...a couple, actually. One concerning a rather important prophecy about Christ at birth, about the type of cloth He would be held in. though it seems trivial, it was quite important.

Yea, see, NIV always seemed shifty!!@%@@!%@!

biggrin.gif
 
I bought and paid for the upgrade to Bible Library software. It has several. So, Like Malo, I put other.

Cory
 
hmm...i got free Bible software (e-Sword) which has about a dozen translations. But then my actual physical Bibles are KJV, NKJV, NIV, The Message, ASV, and ESB
 
Just $0.02 from me...

NIV is a very political work. (So was the KJV, for what that's worth.) In my research on the Bible, I found that the RSV was the one that seemed to be the best as far as reliability goes. I do find it very interesting to compare different versions.
 
this is true, and the RSV is a good version, but I tend to prefer the ASV or Webster's given the choice.
 
rock.gif


y'know, I find that highly......disturbing.
sad.gif





So does that mean Christ prayed to His 'Parental Unit?'

I see it now, the beginning of the Lord's Prayer...

Our Parent which is Heaven....
 
Back
Top