Good points Thaddius.
However, we still have this verse to contend with, "14 Does not the very nature of things teach you that if a man has long hair, it is a disgrace to him."
What about this verse gives any indication that it was meant for Corinth alone? Many people on this board have admonished me for limiting verses to its target audience, so why is it permissible now? Now who has the double standard?
This snippet comes from
www.keyway.ca
[b said:
Quote[/b] ]The apostle Paul (see On The Road To Damascus) actually saw Jesus Christ (1 Corinthians 9:1). Paul, a trustworthy man who wrote a large part of the New Testament, knew exactly what The Lord looked like. In 1 Corinthians 11:14, Paul wrote, "if a man has long hair, it is a disgrace to him." It's quite unthinkable that Paul would have made such a statement if Jesus Christ had long hair. How could anything about The Lord be called disgraceful?
Now watch me work
Christ could not have had long hair for the reasons stated above. Samson, along with Samuel, were Nazirites (Note this is very different from a Nazarene). A Nazarite, according to Numbers 6, took a vow of separation. Judges 13:5 "because you will conceive and give birth to a son [Samson]. No razor may be used on his head, because the boy is to be a Nazirite, set apart to God from birth, and he will begin the deliverance of Israel from the hands of the Philistines."
From tbaptist.com
[b said:
Quote[/b] ]The Nazarite vow was a vow of separation. Three things were forbidden as long as he was under the vow. (1) "He shall separate himself from wine and strong drink, and shall drink no vinegar of wine, or vinegar of strong drink, neither shall he drink any liquor of grapes, nor eat moist grapes, or dried." Num. 6:3. (2) He could not cut his hair. (3) He could not touch or come near a dead body. Num. 6:6-9.
If you believe in the Bible, then you have to believe that Paul was Divinely inspired of God. Paul said, through God, that it was a SHAME for a man to have long hair. This wasn't fashion advice to the men of Corinth.
As for the slave issue, it depends on what exact time period we're looking it. There were many, many indentured servants because of the agrarian culture. Slaves were slaves. Regardless, God still set forth these guidelines. God still felt it was appropriate for a slaveowner to beat his slave, have him die a few days later and receive NO punishment. So says God.
BACK to women...
I think Byblos has an AWFUL lot to learn about women. But hey, that's the fun part