How is that knitting coming along?
Public Service Announcement.
- Thread starter ChickenSoup
- Start date
- Status
How is that knitting coming along?
Avesther
New Member
I don't think associating Cammandus with french is in your best interest, Monsieur French Fried Potato.
Mordos
New Member
or Jackhog
Goodwone
New Member
or Mordos, I mean have you seen his growing spam count lately?
Where
New Member
He will webcamspam you mean face pictures hehe
Mordos
New Member
Mean Face?
*WALL*
New Member
That is the "im thinking" in the bathroom face...
Avesther
New Member
Way TOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO much info.
Paramedics truly have seen it all haven't they....
ChickenSoup
Banned
Knitting is for girls. I am t3h m4n. j00 b surr3ndr1nk t0 m3?
Avesther
New Member
In regards to a white flag, Chickensoup said:
We all know that showing a white flag is communication of admitting defeat and uncondition surrendering to a foe. But the question that lies before us is this: If an opponent sends their foe a white, is akin to waving the white flag and admitting defeat and offering unconditional surrender?
Chickensoup may offer any type of rationalization he wishes, like "I sent that so you can use it." But the fact remains, he mailed us his white flag. He showed us his white flag. This is his white flag, not ours. He bought, he admits it. He sent it to us, which again is a fact not in dispute. The only disputable fact is if intention for us to use it nullifies the fact that he showed us his white flag, which is an admitance of defeat and offering of unconditional surrender.
Lets take for example an army, in the midst of battle running a white flag up the flag standard. Do they do this and yell to their opposition, "When you are ready to surrender, come and get this flag and use it to surrender?" That doesn't work, the moment the white flag is shown to the foe, the enemy sees it and acknowledges that the party flying, or showing the flag, has admitted defeat.
The fact is, we are in possession of his white flag. I say, SoE has admitted defeat and offered unconditional surrender. What ever guise they may choose to argue herein after is not of common practice and thusly should be and rightly so discarded.
REDEEMED IS VICTORIOUS AGAIN!
We all know that showing a white flag is communication of admitting defeat and uncondition surrendering to a foe. But the question that lies before us is this: If an opponent sends their foe a white, is akin to waving the white flag and admitting defeat and offering unconditional surrender?
Chickensoup may offer any type of rationalization he wishes, like "I sent that so you can use it." But the fact remains, he mailed us his white flag. He showed us his white flag. This is his white flag, not ours. He bought, he admits it. He sent it to us, which again is a fact not in dispute. The only disputable fact is if intention for us to use it nullifies the fact that he showed us his white flag, which is an admitance of defeat and offering of unconditional surrender.
Lets take for example an army, in the midst of battle running a white flag up the flag standard. Do they do this and yell to their opposition, "When you are ready to surrender, come and get this flag and use it to surrender?" That doesn't work, the moment the white flag is shown to the foe, the enemy sees it and acknowledges that the party flying, or showing the flag, has admitted defeat.
The fact is, we are in possession of his white flag. I say, SoE has admitted defeat and offered unconditional surrender. What ever guise they may choose to argue herein after is not of common practice and thusly should be and rightly so discarded.
REDEEMED IS VICTORIOUS AGAIN!
ewoksrule
Active Member
Your Vizzini's Logic has numbed my mind and I wave a white cloth diaper in the air. (yes we use cloth diapers in this household!) (on the babies, not on me) (ok sometimes we use disposable diapers when we go on a long outing) (again, not on me, but on the twins) (I have no time to knit and I am not a girl so I can't knit anyways, so the cloth diaper will have to suffice as a white flag.)
Deuteronomy
New Member
That was indeed a great piece of logic. I see no way of countering it.
Glitch
New Member
if that ever happens... i might consider getting WoW for myself... haha.
Avesther
New Member
The difference between Vizzini and I is that I am often known as Dread Pirate Roberts (I mean, seriously, who would be afraid of the Dread Pirate Avesther?) and I have built up an immunity to Iocane powder.
Deuteronomy
New Member
The Princess Bride FTW!
"My name is Inigo Montoya, you killed my father, prepare to die!"
"My name is Inigo Montoya, you killed my father, prepare to die!"
ewoksrule
Active Member
what you find in my kids' white cloth diapers is much much worse then Iocane powder.
Deuteronomy
New Member
So now you admit that you wear cloth diapers! Inconceivable!
nattyg
New Member
they're breathable!
- Status