Odale
Active Member
I'll wait for HCS on this one.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You forgot Jon Stewart's Daily Show.This is great! The Colbert Report will now make fun of the democrats! Haha!
The whole "messiah" thing about Obama has really creeped me out.
http://www.alittleleaven.com
I mean helping out the poor is nice, but there are times when other folks should be added to the equation.
The taxes have always been scaled based on income. Because I only work part time I usually get most of my income back as a rebate. If you are making 250+k a year and can't afford to pay 5-10% more taxes then someone who makes 40k, then you need to rethink your expenditures a bit.
taxes by their very nature are socialist policies. Especially the way that Obama views taxes and the thought that they are there to be used for wealth redistribution:How exactly is his taxes "communist"? I would much rather that people stop throwing out FUD in this thread and present evidence with their points. If you need help with that try checking out snopes.com or factcheck.org to verify your claim before posting it.
Obama said:“I just want to make sure that everybody who is behind you, that they’ve got a chance for success too. My attitude is that if the economy’s good for folks from the bottom up, it’s gonna be good for everybody … I think when you spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody.”
exactly! Consider, we are under duress to pay these taxes, and if you don't then you are punished, and your property is taken. Despite the long history of private ownership of property, with the introduction of property taxes we no longer own it, but rather rent it from the government (don't believe me? don't pay the property taxes and see how quickly you get evicted by the county).My first reading of the US constitution was that the US Federal gov't could only collect taxes to pay down debt and maintain an armed forces. If it includes the governments rights to take taxes for other things, please point it out because I must have missed it. (I suppose HCS will be suprised that I read over the US constitution when he linked it).
One of the strongest points of America is Capitalism and the right to own property. The question about taxes is: If the government can demand a part of your property under a wealth distribution plan (which national health care can be defined as) under threat of penalties and jail, is your property owned by you or the community?
If the government can demand a portion of your property to distribute to the community, then by definition, you are living under communist ideals.
There is no mandate in the Constitution to allow for a nationalized health care system. At least none of the proponents of it have ever been able to point it out to me.The article does not answer the question: Is the government mandated or compelled or even allowed by the US Constitution to be in the arena of providing national health care? That is to either collect taxes to pay for health care for those without insurance or to compell companies to pay for health insurance for its employees?
Oh, I didn't even read the first portion...so you expect people to pay more for you because you work part time? Wow...just...wow...
Perhaps we should consider taxing part time people more for not contributing as much to the economy and national production?
I've seen figures up to 39% on federal taxes alone. That's not a 5% increase. I'm in off the chart on the 1040 form and have to do the big equation to figure out what I pay... but it's still around 28% (even taking the Alternative Minimum Tax into account, which can hit people as low as $35,000 gross income.) Then add in that because of rocketing insurance costs... I will actually bring home about $10,000 less than I did last year
What really hurts is the jump that it takes from 249,999 by earning that last extra dollar. Take into consideration that inflation was nearly 5% this year (4.9% YTD), then make $1 too much and get smacked with a 11% tax hike? ouch.
To imply that I'm mismanaging my funds is a horrible statement. I tithe and gift to my church, go out of my way to volunteer at the church (which takes money for food and gas) I teach a Sunday school class (where I purchase supplies for the lessons). I don't smoke, drink, gamble, or do drugs. My biggest source of "wasted money" is my cell phone and my cable/internet bills. To say that I'm wasting my income is slapping me in the face for working my tail off to make a good living. I work 60 hours a week, my wife works 80 hours a week. I'm sorry if our 140 hours a week means that we're too rich to keep what we've earned, but you can keep flipping burgers for 20 hours a week if that's what you'll be satisfied with.
For one, it's not individuals, it's families 250k or less (then again, even they don't know their own plan as they've cited different numbers and qualifications throughout the process). What right do you have to tell someone they have to pay proportionally more because they're more successful or how to spend their money? How do you know they're not using that money for charitable purposes, whether they claim them on taxes or not (e.g. I for one do not as I think it violates the general premise of giving, personally).
Secondly, families at that border aren't (generally) wealthy enough to have sophisticated financial planning or tax shelters as those who are say making millions a year (e.g. most of Congress through one way or another...Mr. Obama, Hollywood, etc...) so the people at the low end of the "high" bracket are the ones shouldering the brunt of the burden whereas those making the most can move money around, defer compensation and generally shelter it to avoid negative tax implications. Then there's the impact this has on small businesses / self-employed people.
I think a better idea would be that people be financially responsible for themselves and not be like the woman with acrylic nails but can't afford milk, or better...expecting someone else to come along and pay for their mortgage.
I understand this isn't supposed to be a flame thread, but comments like that are, to say the least, a bit inflammatory and poorly thought out.
I think it's a bit higher than that. After all, over a third of all Americans don't pay taxes--yet we keep giving them "tax cuts" (which in Liberal-speak is the same thing as a tax credit).As far as I understand it, someone who makes less than $10,000 a year owes no taxes. That may have changed, I really don't know. Generally speaking, all the part time students at my job make well under that. I think that's what he meant.
OK this needs to stop now. VKs comments were not directed toward anybody specifically and yet you have made some fairly pointed and highly personal attacks aimed at him. While the last part of his comment may be flippent the first part merely explained the tax system as he understood it. To suggest he is lazy "but you can keep flipping burgers for 20 hours a week if that's what you'll be satisfied with" or take his post completely out of context "Oh, I didn't even read the first portion...so you expect people to pay more for you because you work part time?" is very upsetting.
No, wall street did NOT get us into this situation. That falls squarely on two placesCome on folks, let's not argue okay? It happens, they hike up the taxes because they want to make more money. Hopefully Obama manages to do something decent. Let's just hope he doesn't mess with the government too bad, I doubt that their going to be as tolerant about his messing with their programs. I'm hoping the wall street people get it the most, they did get us into this situation afterall. Its only fair that they give back the money they took.
Quote:
The Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) (NYSE: FNM), commonly known as Fannie Mae, was a United States publicly traded government sponsored enterprise (GSE)