[toj.cc]phantom said:
Yea, seperate entity my foot. Same way EB is a seperate entity from Gamestop still.

If you were to go boutique you're better off with Falcon Northwest who's always been superior but pushed themselves into the mainstream less.
Also Windows X64 is an irrelevant consideration as almost all 32-bit apps run normally under it, and some of them even faster. The big problem had been driver support for some older products but even that's becoming a non-factor.
Now to the comment saying I'm senile for thinking that a computer built now could last 5-7 years easily. Socket 939 has a good solid upgrade path from a mid-entry level box through the current high end. It supports PCI-E and all of AMD's latest chips including dual-cores, as well as SATA, while still supporting old standbys of IDE and PCI. The hardware market has also cooled substantially to where we no longer see completely new interfaces, chips, and gigahertz speed jumps on a yearly basis. These things have slowed to years between their arrivals let alone actual implementations in consumer products.
Even if let's say Intel and AMD pick up that torrid pace of innovation again that only puts you in the better spot. Even if the FX-60 were to be the last chip to support the 939 socket, which it wouldn't be, it would be more then adequate to provide an acceptable level of play on all but the most bleeding edge games of tommarow when coupled with the appropriate graphics card. CD drives will eventually end up on SATA and good IDE hard drives have become the exception not the rule. PCI-E is also no fluke and firmly entrenched, as AGP is on its dying breath, and will likely be at minimum another 5 years before another unified standard will be agreed upon. Even if dedicated physics cards become the norm, which will still be another two generations of hardware down the line, they'll be as early video cards using only a PCI-E slot and not a dedicated "graphics" slot.
You look at the way things are going and there's only going to be one thing that will completely invalidate a well planned computer at this point in time. A total step redesign in what a computer is and how it functions, which isn't on the forseeable horizon, which is going to be the only real jump from this point forward in what a computer is able to do for us. A well planned investment at this point will be able to satisfy you within good reason for at least 5 years from this point on with a minimum of post purchase investment.
Now couple of things to His suggestion. First I'd go with the 3700+ over the 3500+ for a minimal cost increase of $20:
http://www.zipzoomfly.com/jsp/ProductDetail.jsp?ProductCode=80719-5
On the mobo I would be willing to scrimp elsewhere for something like this MSI board:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16813130491
People so frequently skimp and cheap out on the mobo figuring it's the least important speed consideration when in fact it is the thing that can most easily cripple an otherwise speedy system.
I don't like the Rosewill brand and would probably go for Corsair value RAM, but that's a matter of preference and mostly for company and product quality. The Audigy 2 is a good card but very hard to recommend at $70 when the X-Fi can be had for $40, which trust me is a big step over the Audigys, and that money would be better invested somewhere else or saved towards the X-Fi while onboard makes due for the time being.
Now I have to really question the case and PSU choice, an $80 PSU with a $20 case? Take that money and go with something like the Antec Sonata II instead:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16811129155
High quality build on the case, PSU supply as good as the Thermaltake one, and it'll make your system a lot more comfortable with guaraunteed better airflow that Antec prides themselves on in their cases and most cheap cases pass on in the interest of cost. I'd also say go with this harddrive from Seagate instead:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16822148065
$16 more for an extra 100 gigs. Only difference in the drives is that the 7200.8 is the product line Seagate just left to launch the 7200.9.
The 7900GT also isn't your best bet for the money mainly because of the surrounding system. The card's going to be so much faster then anything else in it that it's going to be constantly met with bottlenecks . Not saying it's not a viable strategy as long as you're aware because there's two options. You can get a drastically cheaper card that performs not too far below and then upgrade to a similiarly positioned card in two to three years, or you can spend more now on the higher end card whose price increase isn't in line with the performance increase and have a better performer over those two to three years, but require a greater overarching investment if upgraded as it falls off after that time period.