Patriot
Active Member
Sure He does. But that was more of a deflection than an answer.God knows.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sure He does. But that was more of a deflection than an answer.God knows.
I would have let you get away with it. I just wanted to make sure you knew that I knew you were deflecting. It bothers me that politicians are rarely called out for deflecting. The person asking the question should at least note that the question was not answered even if it remains that way. Pet peeve, I suppose.It was
But since I won't be able to hedge in peace, I'll have to go with:
Perhaps this is the center of the discussion. I draw the line differently than others. But perhaps I draw that line because:There IS a line here. I'm not sure where it is, but God does.
I have an extremely hard time focusing on worship if I don't agree with the words of a song. I enjoy a good beat (really like hymns put to more modern rhythms), but I can't get around the words.Songs that are crudely created and performed can also worship God. Many children's songs fall in this category. When a song is crudely written, however, it can distract us. That is a problem, although we can (and sometimes must) overcome this with discipline.
Blind Boys of Alabama. Love that version.Have you ever heard Amazing Grace sung to the tune of The House of The Rising Sun? It used to have some popularity a number of years ago. I have yet to weigh in with my favorites.
I believe that the heart is vital, but the method and medium is important as well. Let's consider an extreme example. . .can one properly worship God while singing the praises of satan? How about while singing a song that is merely crude and offensive? How about a song that one knows is theologically flawed?
Then I would argue that the spectrum you are using is bad. Where does "theologically accurate" fit in if those two items are on each end?I don't think the medium is as important as people like to make it out to be. Your examples of "singing the praises of satan" and "theologically flawed" are two completely opposite ends of the spectrum. One is clearly blasphemy while the other is off.
Everything. How do you know who you are worshiping? Why are you worshiping? How to worship?What does "theology" have to do with worshiping God?
This seems a bit relativistic to me. The proper view is backed up with Scripture.Well, depending on to what extremes, or what views, people could claim just about anything to be theologically flawed.
There is certainly a place for ignorance. But we must be careful of willful ignorance.Does God look away from our worship if we do something in ignorance? If my heart is fully worshiping God, but the word I say in my ignorance "aren't theologically sound" does that nullify my intentions?
I don't think the medium is as important as people like to make it out to be. Your examples of "singing the praises of satan" and "theologically flawed" are two completely opposite ends of the spectrum. One is clearly blasphemy while the other is off. What does "theology" have to do with worshiping God? Well, depending on to what extremes, or what views, people could claim just about anything to be theologically flawed.
Does God look away from our worship if we do something in ignorance? If my heart is fully worshiping God, but the word I say in my ignorance "aren't theologically sound" does that nullify my intentions?
I am not saying that we should sing "theologically flawed" songs, but what defines a "theologically flawed" song? More to the point, there are a large majority of worship songs that have very little "theology" in them, or what most people would think of theology.
Sorry about the double post but I wanted to comment on this too. I am not sure if you are promoting music with very little theology in them (NTTAWWT), and yes the vast majority of contemporary music doesn't. However, my gifting and passion is for teaching and any opportunity I have to sneak a little theological education in to my congregation is a bonus too me. Many of your classic hymns were rich in theology and were the main way the masses learned it.I am not saying that we should sing "theologically flawed" songs, but what defines a "theologically flawed" song? More to the point, there are a large majority of worship songs that have very little "theology" in them, or what most people would think of theology.
What I mean by theologically flawed songs would be a song which paints a theologically inaccurate picture of God. I have been trying to think of a specific example, but I don't have my notes with me and many times it's very subtle because if it were clearly heretical the song would have been thrown out from the beginning. A generic example would be something like a song that included lyrics about believers becoming angles. This is a pervasive belief among many Christians, but is non Scriptural and is theologically wrong. Would I call it heresy? Not exactly but I don't want to promote that belief among my congregation.
Sorry about the double post but I wanted to comment on this too. I am not sure if you are promoting music with very little theology in them (NTTAWWT), and yes the vast majority of contemporary music doesn't.
However, my gifting and passion is for teaching and any opportunity I have to sneak a little theological education in to my congregation is a bonus too me. Many of your classic hymns were rich in theology and were the main way the masses learned it.
Allow me to clarify my opinion (and it is just that, and opinion). There are a lot of bands out there that fall under the category of "Christian music." A lot of them produce some very good music which I encourage people to listen to. However, a lot of that music isn't intended to be theological in nature and thus really isn't. Singing about how God has saved you from a life of drugs, alcoholism and promiscuous sex is great and may elistit praise for the Father, but its not theological. Nor does it have to be. I personally wouldn't choose such a song for the "praise and worship" part of the service" (the whole service should be worship but that's an entirely different topic). I do think putting a song like that in as a special, or a prelude would be ok if it fit the service.I want to be clear, I am not promoting ignorance or bad theology. I would agree with you that it is not something that should be promoted.
As per your example, many Christians do believe that, and while that is sad, it is out of ignorance, and not spite. As such, if there is sincerity in their hearts, are they doing something wrong in worshiping God in their ignorance?
To claim the "vast majority" of contemporary music is "lacking in theology" is a very broad statement. A lot of older music is "lacking in theology" as well, and we should stay away from blanket statements such as this.
Ah, we are probably attacking this issue from different angles.To be clear, theology may not the the correct word for what I am meaning to say. It might be the right word, just to a different degree.
Ah, see I think we are heading to the same destination. Does a song have to be "theological" to be a praise song? I would have to say no. It should be theologically accurate however. Revelation Song is one of my favorite praise songs. I get God bumps every time I sing it in worship. It is Scriptural, it paints a beautiful picture of Christ's sitting at the right hand of the Father. Does it teach theology, not directly.Here's the question, why are you praising or worshiping God? Is it to sing "theological" songs to teach the masses? Or is it to praise and worship God? Does a song have to be "theological" to be considered a song of praise to God? (That question doesn't sound right when I re-read it, so y'all might not understand my question.) I believe theology might be too broad of a term to use in my question, but cannot think of anything better right now.
I believe worship to be a very intimate thing, and as such, I believe we can all praise and worship God in different ways. Again, I am not supporting, or promoting ignorance (in fact the exact opposite) however we have to understand that in reality there are a large majority that are ignorant.
As a teacher, you're held to a higher standard. I appreciate that, and understand why you want to "sneak a little theological education" in, but as a teacher it is easy (in fact, that is part of the gift) to want to use every opportunity to teach. While I appreciate that (I am the same) that can leave a bias against things that do not "teach". (I hope you understand what I'm trying to say, it doesn't sound right in my head, but I am unable to formulate better words right now.)
Agreed. I also have to pay attention to my attitude and not be too critical or God forbid, condemning of those who don't hold the standards I do. If I have come across as such it was not my intent and I beg your (everyone's) forgiveness. Our goal is to Praise the Ever Living God by sharing the Gospel of Jesus in the Spirit of love, drawing all to Him and building His Kingdom.I am not saying that we "should" promote songs that are "theologically flawed", or "lacking in theology". I just think that we can put too much emphasis on being "right" and let that get in the way of God. In essence, letting our intellect get in the way.
Yes, so I am going to shut my cake hole now so people can get back to loving some good music.We have really gotten off topic haven't we?
Some previously mentioned:
It is Well with My Soul
The Old Rugged Cross
Come Thou Fount (for the same lyrics Marinus mentioned)
Will also add:
His Eye is on the Sparrow (1905)
I heard the Bells on Christmas Day - has a pretty interesting history. Sorry I'm too lazy to type it on my phone. Words 1864, music 1845/1872 depending which tune.
I'm sure there are others I can't think of right now.
Long my imprisoned spirit lay
Fast bound in sin and nature’s night;
Thine eye diffused a quickening ray,
I woke, the dungeon flamed with light;
My chains fell off, my heart was free,
I rose, went forth, and followed Thee.
My chains fell off, my heart was free,
I rose, went forth, and followed Thee.
Source: http://www.hymnal.net/hymn.php/h/296#ixzz2SzzBXIvy
And Can it Be? - Charles Wesley - 1738 tune Thomas Campbell 1825