dorkelf
Active Member
My computer is a 2.4 GhZ P4 with two 512 DDR chips (matching, runs as dual channel). It has a 250 GB SATA drive (7200 RPM 8 MB cache I believe, but can't remember the specifics) and a Radeon 9600 All-in-wonder video card (oldie but a goodie).
My brother's computer is a HP with a 2.4 GhZ P4. It has two 128 DDR chips (256 total memory) and a new 300GB Seagate 7200 RPM with a 16MB cache I just installed for him. As far as I know, all other components are "stock".
My brother boots Windows XP (SP1) in 16 seconds. My computer takes at least twice that long, maybe closer to a minute. My brother's computer also seems considerably faster than mine for Internet browsing with Firefox or IE (we both have broadband, but his is via Charter cable).
Does anyone have any ideas about why my computer is so much slower to boot XP, and slower in general use (opening and using the browser, etc) despite having more memory and the same processor as my brother's PC?
Paul
My brother's computer is a HP with a 2.4 GhZ P4. It has two 128 DDR chips (256 total memory) and a new 300GB Seagate 7200 RPM with a 16MB cache I just installed for him. As far as I know, all other components are "stock".
My brother boots Windows XP (SP1) in 16 seconds. My computer takes at least twice that long, maybe closer to a minute. My brother's computer also seems considerably faster than mine for Internet browsing with Firefox or IE (we both have broadband, but his is via Charter cable).
Does anyone have any ideas about why my computer is so much slower to boot XP, and slower in general use (opening and using the browser, etc) despite having more memory and the same processor as my brother's PC?
Paul