Alright, I'm here to get my hands dirty with some scripture
Starting with Apostolic Succession, you can turn to the wonderful chapter of Mathew 16. In verse 13 Jesus asks his disciples "Who do you say that I am?" Peter answered that Jesus was the Messiah (the first time an apostle had done so). Jesus then told Peter in Matt 16:18 "you are rock and on this rock I will build my church." Jesus established His Church on a person. Notice how from here on Peter takes charge of leading the disciples. On Easter Sunday, John and Peter ran to the tomb, but John did not enter till after Peter (even though John got there first) because Peter was the leader. In the council of Jerusalem in Acts, Peter is the one who makes the final decision on the non-circumcision of gentiles; after he gives the command, it is decided how it will be implemented, but there is no further discusion on the subject of whether it will be implemented or not. Finally, Peter's name is mentioned in the new testment more times than ALL OF THE OTHER APOSTLES COMBINED. Numbers mean alot in the Bible, and Peter is mentioned near 250 times. Since Peter we have had 251(?) Popes. Directly after Peter was Linus, directly followed by Anacletus. The Early Church Fathers mention the importance of the popes and willingly submitted to them. It was not untill Martin Luther broke away from the Church that protestant churches broke the previously unbroken Apostolic Succession. It is because of this that we Catholics believe that Protestants do not have the the ability to perform sacraments, save Baptism and Matromony.
As for Reconciliation (confession), Jesus set us free from our sins by dying on the cross and resurecting. On Easter Sunday he gave us the sacrament of reconciliation as the means by which we could come back to him. Matt 20: 22b: "Recieve the Holy Spirit. If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven; if you retain the sins of any, they are retained." Why did Jesus say this? Why didn't he just say "tell people to ask me for forgiveness"? Because he wanted people to confess their sins to priests. There's a couple reasons we do this: 1) we are physical, God is not. We can not see God in His Glory nor, usually, hear His voice. Now what if you KNEW something was wrong and said, "Screw God's law! This is what I want to do and I'm gonna do it." That's what we call Mortal Sin (it kills God's life within the soul because it has rejected God and all He offers). In order to restore the life of God, the person has to be truly sorry and do whatever is necessary to not do that action again. The Priest, as implied above, is in the person of Christ. We are telling our sins to God, not just Priest. At the same time, and more importanly, God, through the Priest, can consoul the repentant and help them overcome their weakenesses that they could not overcome alone. Who needs to pay a concilor? That's why God gave us Priests....to help us come to Him! Also, it takes alot more to say to a person that you're sorry than to just think it (otherwise protestants would never bring this up...it's alot easier to just think "i'm sorry" than actually have to act on it). This is one of the steps to showing that one it truely sorry.
As for miracles, did not Jesus say, "Greater things will you do in my name"?
Concerning Mary, I don't think you guys know where the Hail Mary comes form. IT COMES FROM THE BIBLE
Look at Luke 1:28. The angel, FROM GOD, tells her "Hail, Full of Grace." Catholics don't honour Mary any more than God does. God allowed Mary to become the Mother of Jesus' Human nature. The angel, in the name of the Lord, said Hail to Mary, not us! Next, look at Luke 1:42 (this is an awesome chapter) Elizabeth tells Mary "Blessed are you among women and blessed is the fruit of thy womb, Jesus!" WOW!!! It just so happens that THIS is in the Bible too
Are we Catholics Biblical or what?
Notice that Elizabeth was filled with the Holy Spirit at this time, so it was quite a reality that God speaking through her.
As for praying for the dead, Martin Luther didn't really like that part, so he took out First Maccabees and Second Maccabees (both of which Chronicle historical events writen in ancient Roman history texts), as well as numerous other books. Now, if you look at the early copies of the Bible, they contain all 72 books of the Bible, which was finalized in 402 at the council of Hippo. Did you know that there was a Gospel of Peter but that the Catholic Church, from which the Bible came by the way, was not deemed inspired and was not thus included? You can check out the early church father about that too. They also mention the mass, and alot of other Catholic things. Do be warned though: to read the early Church Fathers is to read about the Catholic Church and her beliefs.
Finally, there is not a single teaching in the Catholic Church which contracts what the Bible says (according to the Bible in context, not a personal interpretation, including any Catholic who mis-interprets the Bible).
That's all that I can say right now, but Catholics are not ignorameouses, nor are we idots for what we believe, nor do any of our beliefs counter what is in the Bible.