Net Neutrality update:

Atown

Christian Gamers Alliance Amazon Store Manager
Staff member
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/09/business/media/09fcc.html?_r=1&ref=technology&oref=slogin

F.C.C. to Look at Complaints Comcast Interferes With Net

* Sign In to E-Mail or Save This
* Print
* Reprints
* Share
o Del.icio.us
o Digg
o Facebook
o Newsvine
o Permalink

Published: January 9, 2008

LAS VEGAS (AP) — The Federal Communications Commission will investigate complaints that Comcast actively interferes with Internet traffic as its subscribers try to share files online, the commission’s chairman, Kevin J. Martin, said Tuesday.

Mr. Martin confirmed the investigation in comments at the Consumer Electronics Show.

In an investigation last year, The Associated Press found that Comcast in some cases hindered file sharing by subscribers who used BitTorrent, a popular file-sharing program. The findings, first reported Oct. 19, confirmed claims by users who also noticed interference with other file-sharing applications.

“We look forward to responding to any F.C.C. inquiries regarding our broadband network management,” said David L. Cohen, executive vice president at Comcast.

Comcast denies that it blocks file sharing, but acknowledged after The A.P. article that it was “delaying” some traffic between computers that share files. The company said the intervention was necessary to improve the surfing experience for the majority of its subscribers.

Peer-to-peer file sharing is a common way to exchange copyright files illegally, but companies are also rushing to use it for legal distribution of video and game content. If Internet providers hinder or control that traffic, it makes them gatekeepers of Internet content.

The F.C.C.’s response will be an important test of its willingness to enforce “net neutrality,” the principle that Internet traffic be treated equally by carriers. The agency has a broadly stated policy supporting the concept, but its position has not been tested in a real-world case.

This will be interesting to see what the FCC does in this situation. I dislike the idea of comcast being the "gatekeepers" reminds me of the quote from the matrix

Sentient programs. They can move in and out of any software still hardwired to their system. That means that anyone we haven't unplugged is potentially an agent.

Inside the Matrix, they are everyone and they are no one.
We have survived by hiding from them, by running from them. But they are the gatekeepers. They are guarding all the doors, they are holding all the keys which means that sooner or later, someone is going to have to fight them.
 
uuuugh. Sounds like fun. I transfer files/levels (usermade ones for CS:S) pictures/sounds clips (that i have recorded) and all sorts of stuff thru Xfire.

Love that line from the matrix. love it :D
 
Look at the bright side, with proprietary operating systems you really don't know what is running in the background :P
 
THe FCC need sto stay out of this. comcast is a non-gov't entity and while what they are doing is objectionable it is not illegal. Net neutrality really is a smokescreen for more gov't involvement in our daily lives..which if you read the US constitution most of what our Gov't does these days is actually illegal at the federal level.
 
^^

This is a tough issue for me. On one hand I would love for all internet providers to be fair in their services and not give priority to protocols or sites that pay more money. The idea that the internet can be "bought" off is crazy ridiculous, but its the providers that are putting in these controls.

The flip side is even scarier to have the government force businesses to be fair. How do they enforce this policy other than monitoring and injecting their oversight into the networks. This also prohibits content providers from providing prioritized services that consumers might enjoy. If anything the solution is MORE COMPETITION between internet providers. If Comcast is giving you a bad rap, move to someone who promotes non-interference. Supply and demand!
 
you say the government shouldt be involved but doesnt the government make sure monopolys do not occur? its just like vibro said, in some areas comcast really is the only choice. in my area road runner is the only choice, and its a lame one too
 
I live in rural Montana and we have at least 4 internet options:

1. DSL (we have at least 3 providers of DSL who piggyback on the last mile wire provider)
2. Wireless (old radio signal tower technology) semi expensive to setup.
3. Verizon Wireless (decent speeds, but nothing like metro areas)
4. Cable (good speeds, only 1 provider)
 
Back
Top