What is with the liberal temper tantrum?

Wyldcard

New Member
I am trying to figure out why the liberals are being such sore losers after losing to President Bush yet again. They spew their propaganda that he is dumb; however when he beats them, and they have more egg on their face, they are lashing out. President Bush reaches out to them, and they are spitting in his face (so to speak). Calling him names. Calling his 59 million supporters names.

Their reaction is discrediting them even more. They are showing contempt, and disdain for the majority of Americans. I have personally reached out to liberals at work with love, and their response has been hate. I see no reason for their pure unadultrated hatred. They are the ones that preach tolerance of diversity and civility; yet they are the most intolerant of diversity of thought, and the most cruel to those different than themselves.

One liberal at work told me that he can't wait for liberals to get in power again, so they can put all Christians in concentration camps. I pray for them every night, and they seem to be getting worse. Anyone have any ideas?
 
Fair question that I can't seem to answer either.

I have one hypothesis, though.

Democrats are moving more and more for socialist "values". The majority of Americans *I* know despise socialism, remember what great lengths our country and leaders like Reagan have done to do away with it. Thus, with their continuing attitude of "LET'S TAKE AWAY FROM EVERYONE WHO HAS AND GIVE IT TO THE HAVE NOTS" (a rather Marxist attitude [dumb]) if you ask me. I think the biggest problem is that at their core, liberals believe that humans are naturally good, as opposed to the biblical standard of us being sinners. They assume things can be reached by human means. This is not so, and really conflicts with what mainstream America believes. Thus, it would conflict with our Judeo-Christian values, leaving them with a sourly bitter taste in their mouth. Perhaps this answers the hatred and distaste for Christians? Of course, the whole idea of socialism is to dominate the people, and when liberals don't get to do that, they get fussy. Sorta like a kid that doesn't get his toy when he wants it =]

Also, have you noticed that in this campaign......anything that would have HURT America would have helped the liberals? They have positioned themselves in such a way that they would be better off(politically speaking) if America was hurting and in a predicament.
 
Another sign of human idiocy, that's all. The more people in the world, the more fools there will be.
 
That's true MaxX, that's true. However I do see more Democrats doing that than Republicans, hmmmm...
rock.gif
 
Remember that in the recent past, Republicans were acting that way about Clinton. (the far right were anyway) Lets be careful about where we are pointing fingers. They just lost an election to a man that most of them hate, so it is to be expected that some of them will be upset. Neither side is perfect and we still all have to live together in the nation.

Cory
 
Agreed. I never hated Clinton, only was sheerly disgusted by the fact that he defiled the highest office on this planet.

So goes human kind. Defiling the thrones God gives them.
 
I'm going to repeat what I said in another post.

We had two very different candidates running for president, one from the far right, and one from the far left. Most americans *I* know are moderates, like myself. Anyway, there was a lot of friction between the two sides as we haven't really had an election with two candidates that were so very different lately, and people didn't know how to handle it. Republicans included.
 
Point remains.......The seething, unadulterated hatred simply does not exist on the right. The democrats have become the party of Michael Moore and George Soros, and it shows. They now *are* the mainstream, not the moderates (aka another word for liberals).
 
Being modorate does not make you a liberal. Neither party is perfect in the platform that they run on, both of them have people they wish they could be rid of. (David Duke ring a bell?) There is no common sense legislation in America, its either one way or the other. The Constitutionalists and Libertereans(sp?) both have a very good platform, but if they ever become a big competitor to the other two is doubtful. Imagine, a government that was both fiscally and socially responsible. That would be something new.

Cory
 
[b said:
Quote[/b] ]unadulterated hatred simply does not exist on the right

Have you seen farenhype 911?
Republicans are guilty of the same finger-pointing name-calling that the democrats are. Politics...eeesh.


Also, whats with the conservatives that like to provoke liberals in to having temper tantrums for their own personal pleasure?
 
No, I have not seen Farenhype 9/11, but I think it's proper to note that a democract, one who served under Clinton (and got him re-elected), is the key backer of the entire documentary. He's also been caught in rather lewd acts, so I don't know if I can respect his work or anything. He rather disgusts me when I hear him on the tele, even if he does make sense.


[Edit: I think it should be noted that Farenhype 9/11 was a rebuttal to disprove the lies of Fahrenheit 9/11, which were abundant. Thus, if any name calling *was* done, I'm sure it was the truth (aka, pointing out that the Left is abundant with liars and people of malpractice, recently) I've not seen it, but plan on watching Fhype soon enough. I'll report back when that occurs.]

[2nd Edit: Thaddius, from what I understand, "moderates" vote democrat in a 3:1 ratio, or perhaps more. Yes, therefore logical reasoning can deduct they'll likely vote democrat.]
 
I've seen both, they're both pretty much the same kind of movie. It's just an all out fear, uncertainty and doubtfest. Each does make valid points, but they're all drowned out by the exaggerations they make to get the point across.
 
Well, I've seen Fheit and it wasn't exaggeration, it was sheer lies in the form of clever, though dishonest and misleading, editing. So long as the latter film doesn't cross that line, then I will probably be much more attune with listening and paying attention to it and its credibility.
 
Because you're a conservative...consider them objectively then get back to me. I can see the evidence for many of the claims made by each film, but the editing is what really delivers the blows below the belt.
 
I have considered it objectively; I wonder sometimes if I went in to see that film knowing more than the director, about the subjects he so proudly preached. His "factual" things were nothing more manipulated half-truths.
 
[b said:
Quote[/b] (Que Pasa @ Nov. 06 2004,8:06)]
[b said:
Quote[/b] ]unadulterated hatred simply does not exist on the right

Have you seen farenhype 911?
Republicans are guilty of the same finger-pointing name-calling that the democrats are. Politics...eeesh.


Also, whats with the conservatives that like to provoke liberals in to having temper tantrums for their own personal pleasure?
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaah I see. Now you blame the victims of your temper tantrum. Is there a particular reason liberals can not take responsibility for their own actions? Why must they always blame the victim?
 
This has to do with what I illustrated in my 'republicans win it all' thread. Two cantidates representing the near polar ends of their respective political spectrums has deepened party affiliation and pulled this country's people away from each other ever further. And now only one side is being rewarded, with virtually no bones at all being thrown to the other. Is this going to upset a lot of people? You betcha, approximately half of the country. And the same would most certainly be true of conservatives if liberals won across the board. I'm tired of all the political banter though, for I see no point to it. I'm dissapointed with what happened on election day, but not destroyed. For there's nothing I nor anyone can do about it. Pitching hissy fits isn't going to solve anything.
 
Back
Top