SLNT_FIR
New Member
I am reading a book my mom got for me at the library. It is called "The Case for a Creator". IT gives HEAVY amount of evidence AGAINST old experiments that today's theories are based upon, and brings out NEW findings that PROOVE of a creator.
life did not come from a primordial soup.
1. Miller's experiment (the one about recreating earth's early atmosphere) is bogus. He heavily relied on the atmospheric theories of his doctoral adviser, Nobel laureate Harold Urey. He used the wrong atmosphere. IF you want to know, say so. I have proof.
2. Even if he did use the right atmosphere, he would have gotten Formaldehyde and Cynide. Both VERYVERY toxic "organic" molecules.
-----------------------------------------------------
Another thing is there are many faults in the theory of darwninsm. IT says there are NO SUDDEN CHANGES. Just small mutations. however, in the cambrian age, MANY NUMEROUS multicellular life forms appeared out of single cells. Sponges, jellyfish, BANG! cambrian age. i still have more. but just to let you konw what i have read so far.
life did not come from a primordial soup.
1. Miller's experiment (the one about recreating earth's early atmosphere) is bogus. He heavily relied on the atmospheric theories of his doctoral adviser, Nobel laureate Harold Urey. He used the wrong atmosphere. IF you want to know, say so. I have proof.
2. Even if he did use the right atmosphere, he would have gotten Formaldehyde and Cynide. Both VERYVERY toxic "organic" molecules.
-----------------------------------------------------
Another thing is there are many faults in the theory of darwninsm. IT says there are NO SUDDEN CHANGES. Just small mutations. however, in the cambrian age, MANY NUMEROUS multicellular life forms appeared out of single cells. Sponges, jellyfish, BANG! cambrian age. i still have more. but just to let you konw what i have read so far.