Dark Virtue
New Member
I've made a point of stating that I am an atheist because I lack evidence or proof to substantiate a belief in God. That is usually countered by people offering their personal experiences as proof.
I think I may have been barking up the wrong tree though.
If you are supposed to believe in God WITHOUT evidence, using Faith instead, then is it wrong to ask for evidence? As a Christian, did you believe in God before or after you received your evidence? If you have incontrovertible proof that God exists, as several of you have stated, then doesn't that negate faith?
If you don't have proof, then how do you substantiate your belief based solely on faith? That sounds dangerously close to believing in something because you WANT it to be, and not basing it on anything reasonable.
Which leads me to my next question...Is Faith reasonable?
I think I may have been barking up the wrong tree though.
If you are supposed to believe in God WITHOUT evidence, using Faith instead, then is it wrong to ask for evidence? As a Christian, did you believe in God before or after you received your evidence? If you have incontrovertible proof that God exists, as several of you have stated, then doesn't that negate faith?
If you don't have proof, then how do you substantiate your belief based solely on faith? That sounds dangerously close to believing in something because you WANT it to be, and not basing it on anything reasonable.
Which leads me to my next question...Is Faith reasonable?